The significance of the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics is that:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks for the significance of the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics. The provided data includes a single purported correct statement: "Even though households and firms behave independently and each pursues its own self-interest, the resulting equilibrium is efficient in the sense that it exploits all possible mutually beneficial gains from trade or from reallocation of inputs."

Option analysis follows, though note that there are no separate answer options listed beyond the provided correct statement.

Step-by-step reasoning:
- Core idea of the First Fundamental Theorem: In a perfectly competitive economy, with complete markets and no externalities or public goods, a market equilibrium leads to a Pareto efficient allocation of resources. This means no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off, given the constraints.
- Why the provided statement aligns with the theorem: It emphasizes that even though households and firms act in their own self-interest and independently, the equilibrium they reach through price signals and voluntary exchanges captures all mutually beneficial trades. In other words, the market outcome internalizes all gains from trade to the extent the model’s assumptions hold, which is the essence of Pareto efficiency in this setting.
- Why the general idea is significant: It justifies laissez-faire market mechanisms by claiming that competitive markets can, under certain conditions, produce efficient outcomes without requiring central planning.
- Potential misconceptions addressed:
  - Not all market outcomes are efficient in the real world; deviations occur due to externalities, public goods, incomplete information, or market power, which violate the theorem’s assumptions.
  - The theorem does not claim fairness or equity—only efficiency of allocation given the constraints and assumptions.
  - It does not say individuals cannot improve their situations through redistribution or policy; it says the market outcome is efficient given preferences and technologies.
- Why alternatives (if any) would be incorrect: Typical distractors might claim the theorem guarantees equity, government optimization, or that efficiency arises from a planner’s decisions. Those miss the core point: efficiency under perfect competition emerges from decentralized decisions, not from central planning or equal outcomes.
- If we consider the exact phrasing in the provided statement: it captures the idea that independent self-interested behavior by households and firms can yield an efficient allocation that harnesses all mutually beneficial gains from trade and input reallocation, which is precisely the First Fundamental Theorem's claim under its ideal conditions.
- In sum: the significance is that competitive market equilibria, arising from self-interested actions, can be Pareto efficient with respect to resource allocation, provided the standard assumptions hold. This is the essence of the statement given in the answer field, and it accurately reflects the theorem’s core message.

ECON_104B_001_25S Chapter 16 Practice Problems -- Multiple-Choice

The significance of the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics is that:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler