A bushfire burns through a large area of forest and farmland. A set of office buildings on the outskirts of a major town is completely destroyed by the fire; nothing within the buildings is recoverable.

In the context of information security, the location of the office buildings should be considered as:

Question

A bushfire burns through a large area of forest and farmland. A set of office buildings on the outskirts of a major town is completely destroyed by the fire; nothing within the buildings is recoverable.

In the context of information security, the location of the office buildings should be considered as:

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a scenario where office buildings are completely destroyed by a bushfire, and asks how the location of the buildings should be considered in information security terms.
Since the only provided answer is: 'A vulnerability', we will examine why that classification makes sense.
First, recall the definitions: an asset is something of value to protect (e.g., data, buildings, people), a threat is something that can harm that asset (e.g., fire, burglary, cyberattack), and a vulnerability is a weakness or environmental factor that can be exploited or that increases the risk of loss to an asset.
In this scenario, the location itself is not the asset being destroyed; the asset is the buildings and their contents. The fact that the area is prone to wildfires, and that the buildings are located in a way that makes them susceptible to such fires, represents a weakness in the protective environment around the asset. This weakness could be mitigated by mitigations like firebreaks, barriers, or fire-resistant construction. Therefore, the location acts as a vulnerability in the security model because it creates a higher risk of damage to the asset.
Option analysis:
- If we considered the location as a threat, we would be treating the bushfire as the active attacker or event that causes harm, not the susceptibility itself. While the fire is the threat, the location property is not the threat; it is a condition that affects exposure to that threat.
- If we labeled the location as an asset, we would be incorrectly treating the place as something of value to protect, whereas the value lies in the information, people, or real assets inside and around it, not the location alone.
- If we labeled it as a control, we would be suggesting an action or mechanism that reduces risk; the location itself does not implement a safeguard.
- If we labeled it as a risk or exposure factor only, we would be describing the consequence or likelihood, but the question frames the location as the element that creates the vulnerability, aligning with standard terminology that a location can be a vulnerability.
Because the frame of reference in information security differentiates asset, threat, vulnerability, and control, and because the location creates susceptibility to damage from the threat (bushfire), classifying the location as a vulnerability is consistent with its role in the risk equation (risk = threat × vulnerability × impact).
Note: The absence of other answer options means we cannot compare alternatives here, but the reasoning above supports why 'A vulnerability' is the appropriate characterization of the location in this context.

IFB240_24se2

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler