The Value at Risk (VAR) provides information about the potential size of the expected loss given a level of probability.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement given is a true/false-style claim about Value at Risk (VaR).
Option assessment:
- The claim says: 'The Value at Risk (VAR) provides information about the potential size of the expected loss given a level of probability.'
  This mixes two concepts: VaR as a threshold at a given confidence level, and the idea of an 'expected loss.' VaR is defined as the maximum loss not exceeded with a specified probability (e.g., 95% or 99%) over a given time horizon. It is a quantile of the loss distribution, not an average (expected) loss.
  Because VaR tells you the loss threshold that will not be exceeded with the chosen probability, it does not directly provide the expected size of losses; that would be a different metric, such as the Conditional VaR (also known as Expected Shortfall), which average losses beyond the VaR level.
  Therefore, the statement is inaccurate: VaR does not describe the 'expected loss' at the given probability, but rather the threshold that losses do not exceed with that probability.

Why the claim is incorrect and common misconceptions to note:
- Misconception: VaR equals the average loss in the tail. This is false; VaR is a cutoff point, not an average tail loss.
- Misconception: VaR covers all aspects of risk severity. VaR communicates a threshold for typical losses but ignores information about how bad losses can be beyond the threshold; this is a limitation of VaR.
- Correct complementary concept: If you need an average of losses beyond the VaR threshold, you would use Expected Shortfall (CVaR), which provides the expected loss given that the loss exceeded the VaR level.

In summary, the statement misrepresents what VaR measures by implying it equals the expected loss at a given probability, when in fact VaR is the loss threshold not the mean tail loss.

BU.232.715.51.SP25 HW3

The Value at Risk (VAR) provides information about the potential size of the expected loss given a level of probability.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A portfolio has an expected annual return of 10% and a standard deviation of 16.75%. What is the 1% (analytical) VAR of $100,000 in this portfolio?

When assessing tail risk by looking at the 5% worst-case scenario, the VaR is the ____

A portfolio has an expected annual return of 10% and a standard deviation of 16.75%. What is the 1% (analytical) VAR of $100,000 in this portfolio?

When assessing tail risk by looking at the 5% worst-case scenario, the VaR is the ____

Value at Risk (VaR) at a 95% confidence level for a one-day horizon of $2 million means:

What is the theoretical relationship between N-day VaR and 1-day VaR under the square root of time rule?

In the RiskMetrics framework, what does DEAR (Daily Earnings at Risk) fundamentally measure?

What is the main theoretical advantage of Historic Simulation over the RiskMetrics approach?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler