Summative usability testing can best be described as:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks for a description of summative usability testing, and provides a single answer candidate: 'Quantitative usability testing on the current version of the live site in order to establish a baseline for further quantitative benchmarking'.

Note on options: The options list is empty in the provided data, so there are no alternative statements to analyze or compare against. Because of that, we cannot evaluate multiple choices or explain why one would be correct relative to others. Instead, I will ground the discussion in standard understanding of summative usability testing and then critique the single candidate provided.

General concept: Summative usability testing is typically described as evaluative testing conducted after some or all development work has been completed, with the goal of judging whether the product meets predefined usability objectives or criteria. It is often used to determine if the product is acceptable for release or to meet specific usability targets. This contrasts with formative usability testing, which is iterative and aimed at guiding design improvements during development.

Common characteristics to consider when identifying summative testing:
- Purpose: To assess whether usability goals or benchmarks have been met, providing a pass/fail or quantitative/qualitative verdict on usability readiness.
- Timing: Usually conducted after design iterations have stabilized, either on a near-final version or on a released/product live environment in some cases.
- Data types: Can include both quantitative metrics (task success rate, time on task, error rate, SUS scores) and qualitative feedback (think-aloud observations, user comments).
- Task design: Tasks should reflect realistic use cases representative of typical user goals.
- Decision impact: Results are typically used to make go/no-go or release decisions, or to confirm compliance with usability requirements.

Critique of the provided option:
- Statement: 'Quantitative usability testing on the current version of the live site in order to establish a baseline for further quantitative benchmarking.'
- Why this is problematic as a description of summative testing:
  - It emphasizes quantitative data and benchmarking, which is not inherently exclusive or defining for summative testing; summative work can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed.
  - It specifies testing on the live site. While summative testing can occur on a live or production-like environment, doing so on the live site introduces real-world variability and potential production risk, which is not a universal or defining feature of summative usability testing.
  - The idea of establishing a baseline for further benchmarking implies a pre-step toward ongoing benchmarking rather than a final evaluative judgment about usability readiness, which can be more aligned with formative or ongoing UX measurement programs rather than a single summative assessment.

In summary, summative usability testing is an evaluative method used after development to determine if usability goals are met, and it can utilize both qualitative and quantitative data. The single candidate statement provided focuses narrowly on quantitative benchmarking on a live site and does not capture the broader, evaluative purpose or the possible use of non-live environments and qualitative insights that summative testing may encompass.

If you obtain additional answer options, we could compare each against this standard definition and explain why some align with summative testing while others do not.

Summative usability testing can best be described as:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A software development team conducts user testing sessions to gather feedback on a newly developed mobile app interface. They focus on understanding how easily users can navigate through different features and accomplish tasks efficiently. Which Agile MIS characteristic are there evaluating?

Question at position 1 Prototypes are often used to determine how users react and behave with the prototype. truefalse

位置1的问题 Prototypes are often used to determine how users react and behave with the prototype. truefalse

Which environment would be ideal for testing an office product with a potential user?

According to Nielsen, how many users are necessary to gain noteworthy insights from a design research session?

What criteria should you apply when selecting test participants for usability testing?[Fill in the blank]

When testing interface designs with users, who should you use?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler