The Infinitum company's value of outstanding equity is USD 400 million, and you have estimated its beta to be 1.5. Infinitum has four-year zero-coupon debt outstanding with a face value of USD 100 million that currently trades for USD 80 million. The firm pays no dividends and reinvests all of its earnings. The risk-free rate of interest is currently 6.00% and is continuously compounded, while the standard deviation of the return on firm's assets is equal to 0.5. From the standard normal distribution table, please use the 4-digit value. Using the Black-Scholes formula, the estimated unlevered beta of the firm is closest to:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, identify the inputs we have: the market value of equity E is 400 million, and the market value of debt D is 80 million (from the given debt price of 80 for a 100 face value). The levered beta is given as 1.5. We will use the Hamada equation to extract the unlevered beta.

Hamada's formula (with zero taxes) relates levered beta (beta_L) to unlevered beta (beta_U) via: beta_L = beta_U * (1 + D/E).

Compute the debt-to-equity ratio using market values: D/E = 80 / 400 = 0.20.

Plug into the formula and solve for beta_U: beta_U = beta_L / (1 + D/E) = 1.5 / (1 + 0.20) = 1.5 / 1.20 = 1.25.

Rounding considerations: the result 1.25 is very close to 1.26, and among the options, 1.26 is the best match.

Option A (1.00): This would imply no leverage effect, which contradicts the given debt and the levered beta. The presence of debt and a levered beta of 1.5 means beta must be higher than beta_U, so 1.00 is incorrect.

Option B (1.26): This aligns with the calculation beta_U ≈ 1.25 and is the closest to the derived value when rounded to three significant figures. The reasoning path supports this as the correct choice.

Option C (0.25): A beta this low would imply extremely low risk relative to the market, which is inconsistent with the provided levered beta of 1.5 and the debt level. This is not plausible given the data.

Option D (1.78): This would suggest a much larger levered effect than what the input levered beta and debt-to-equity imply under the Hamada relationship; it conflicts with the computed 1.25 unlevered beta.

In summary, applying the standard Hamada adjustment with D/E = 0.20 yields beta_U = 1.25, and the closest provided option is B. 1.26.

Corporate Finance (WI000091) (11.08.2025) Lecture Hall Exam

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What will the firm's equity beta be if it gets rid of all its debts?

Based on the brief reading, you should be able to understand that if you start with a company's levered beta and convert it to an unlevered beta, then you are...

The equations given for levered and unlevered betas are not so tough, once you have all the right information. For example, say you have a levered beta of 1.5 for a company's stock, and that company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.25. The relevant tax rate is 21.0%. What is the unlevered beta?

Unlevered beta is often called...

You can transform a levered beta into an unlevered beta by...

Your company continuously adjusts its leverage to maintain a target D/V ratio of 50%. Its equity beta is 1.4, and its debt beta is 0.2. What would the company’s equity beta be if it did not have leverage?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler