How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:An order is placed with exactly one waiter, and a waiter can handle multiple orders

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: You need to model the situation where an Order is placed with exactly one Waiter, and a Waiter can handle multiple Orders, using a class diagram.

Option analysis (given the options are placeholders in the prompt, I will describe the correct modeling approach and then explain why the incorrect alternatives would be wrong in typical multiple-choice psychology):

- Correct conceptual approach: Represent a binary association between the classes Order and Waiter with multiplicities that reflect the scenario:
  - Each Order is linked to exactly one Waiter. This means the multiplicity at the Waiter end, from the Order perspective, is 1. In UML terms, Order --1-- Waiter, or more commonly, Order -> Waiter with Waiter having a 1 near the Order end.
  - A Waiter can handle multiple Orders. This means the multiplicity at the Order end, from the Waiter perspective, is * (or 0..* if you want to allow no orders yet). In UML terms, Waiter --*-- Order, or Waiter to Order with Order having * near the Order class.
  - In practice, the diagram would show: a line between Waiter and Order with multiplicities: on the Order side near the Waiter class it would be 1, and on the Waiter side near the Order class it would be * (or 0..*). The exact placement depends on which class you annotate first, but the semantics are the same: each Order has exactly one Waiter; each Waiter has zero or more Orders.

- Why other common interpretations are incorrect:
  - If you place 1..1 on the Order side (i.e., each Waiter has exactly one Order), that would reverse the requirement and imply a Waiter can handle only one Order, which contradicts the statement that a Waiter can handle multiple Orders.
  - If you put 0..* on the Order side with 0..* on the Waiter side, you’d imply that an Order might not be assigned to any Waiter or that a Waiter might not have any Orders, which is acceptable for a partial model but does not enforce the constraint that an Order must have exactly one Waiter. The requirement requires a mandatory association from Order to Waiter (multiplicity 1 on the Waiter end from Order).
  - Modeling as two separate 1:1 associations or as independent classes without an association would fail to capture the relationship between Order and Waiter completely, misrepresenting responsibilities and cardinalities.

- Practical notation tips:
  - The association line can be labeled with role names (e.g., Order has waiter: Waiter) to clarify directionality, but the essential constraint is the multiplicities.
  - If you want to be explicit about the mandatory nature, you can annotate the Order side with a solid dot ( • ) or simply rely on the 1 multiplicity to indicate exactly one Waiter per Order.

- Summary: The correct modeling is a binary association between Waiter and Order with multiplicities Waiter side: * (zero or more Orders) and Order side: 1 (exactly one Waiter). This aligns with the statement: an Order is placed with exactly one Waiter, and a Waiter can handle multiple Orders.

Note: If the exam requires choosing among provided visuals, pick the diagram that shows a single association line between Waiter and Order with multiplicities 1 near the Order end and * near the Waiter end (or 0..* near the Order class depending on notation), rather than options that depict 1..1 or no association at all.

FIT2001_S2_2025 Applied Quiz Practice for Exam (Weeks 2-12) - Questions are by topics

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:An order is placed with exactly one waiter, and a waiter can handle multiple orders

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Match the item from this UML diagram to its description

Which section in the UML holds the list of the class's data attributes?

Composition, aggregation and association are shown in a :

Which of the following statements is NOT true about the design class diagram (DCD)?[Fill in the blank]

Which of the following would NOT be a reasonable way of identifying the classes for your domain model class diagram?

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram: Every restaurant has at least one kitchen, one kitchen is part of exactly one restaurant

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:On a blind date exactly two people take part. A person can take part in multiple blind dates.

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:A fair is visited by at least one visitor. One visitor visits at least one fair.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler