Questions
Questions
Single choice

Question at position 71 A test to screen for a serious but treatable and curable disease is similar to hypothesis testing, with a null hypothesis of no disease, and an alternative hypothesis of disease. If the null hypothesis is rejected treatment will be given. Otherwise, it will not. Assuming the treatment does not have serious side effects, in this scenario it is better to increase the probability of:A test to screen for a serious but treatable and curable disease is similar to hypothesis testing, with a null hypothesis of no disease, and an alternative hypothesis of disease. If the null hypothesis is rejected treatment will be given. Otherwise, it will not. Assuming the treatment does not have serious side effects, in this scenario it is better to increase the probability of:Making a Type 2 error, providing treatment when it is not needed.making a Type 2 error, not providing treatment when it is needed.Making a Type 1 error, not providing treatment when it is needed.making a Type 1 error, providing treatment when it is not needed.Clear my selection

Options
A.Making a Type 2 error, providing treatment when it is not needed.
B.making a Type 2 error, not providing treatment when it is needed.
C.Making a Type 1 error, not providing treatment when it is needed.
D.making a Type 1 error, providing treatment when it is not needed.
View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The question describes a screening test for a serious but treatable and curable disease, with a null hypothesis of no disease and an alternative hypothesis of disease. If the null is rejected, treatment is given; otherwise, it is not. Since the treatment in this scenario does not have serious side effects, the goal is to maximize the chance of giving treatment correctly when disease is present, while balancing the risk of giving treatment when it is not needed. Option......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

If you use Generative AI in this class, you need to include a disclosure statement (linked in the syllabus and available on Camino). There are 3 main components that you are required to include when writing the disclosure statement. Look at Bucky's disclosure statement below and evaluate it. AI Tool Details I used ChatGPT-4, accessed on January 5, 2025, through the OpenAI platform. Prompting Description & Rationale I asked the AI to help explain the concept of Type I and Type II errors in a simple and student-friendly way. The prompt was: "Explain Type I and Type II errors with examples relevant to psychological research, suitable for a beginner-level audience." Source Appropriateness (a) I factored in appropriate sources by ensuring my own understanding of these concepts was based on my course textbook and lecture notes, which I cross-referenced while reviewing the AI output. (b) I carefully fact-checked the AI’s explanation to confirm that the definitions, examples, and terminology aligned with established statistical definitions. I also added clarifications where needed to ensure the explanation was accurate and met the needs of my audience. Is anything missing?

Question at position 79 In leaving for school on an overcast April morning, you make a judgment on the null hypothesis: H0: The weather will remain dry. H1: The weather will change to rain. What would the results be of Type I and Type II errors?In leaving for school on an overcast April morning, you make a judgment on the null hypothesis: H0: The weather will remain dry. H1: The weather will change to rain. What would the results be of Type I and Type II errors?Type I error: needlessly carry around an umbrellaType II error: get drenchedType I error: carry an umbrella and it rainsType II error: carry no umbrella, but the weather remains dryType I error: get drenched Type II error: needlessly carry around an umbrellaType I error: get drenchedType II error: carry no umbrella, but the weather remains dryType I error: get drenchedType II error: carry an umbrella, and it rainsClear my selection

Question at position 65 Which of the following is true about the relationship between the chances of committing a Type I (false positive) or a Type II (false negative) errors in null hypothesis testing? Which of the following is true about the relationship between the chances of committing a Type I (false positive) or a Type II (false negative) errors in null hypothesis testing? They are not relatedThe relationship is infinityThey are positively correlatedThey have an inverse relationshipClear my selection

What's the relationship between Type 1 error, Type 2 error, False positive, and False negative?

More Practical Tools for International Students

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!