The percentage of people reporting that they are stressed has increased throughout the years.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the statement, we consider what it means for the percentage of people reporting stress to increase over time and what evidence would support or contradict it.
Option 1: True
- A number of longitudinal surveys and large-scale reports have shown rising levels of self-reported stress over extended periods, often tied to factors like economic pressures, work-life balance challenges, and rapid societal changes. If the data source in question tracks stress prevalence over many years, an upward trend would align with those broader patterns.
- The interpretation hinges on self-reported perception of stress, which can be influenced by awareness, cultural norms, and willingness to report. In many contexts, increased recognition of stress and greater emphasis on mental health may contribute to higher reported rates even if objective stressors are similar.
- Additionally, methodological shifts over time (e.g., changes in survey questions, sampling methods, or measurement scales) can affect comparability. If the question assumes consistent methodology, a rising percentage can be plausible; if not, observed increases might reflect measurement changes rather than true prevalence shifts.
Option 2: False
- It is possible that in some datasets the percentage of people reporting stress does not rise monotonically; there can be fluctuations due to economic cycles, policy changes, or public health interventions that dampen perceived stress for certain periods.
- If the data source has limited time span, short-term trends could be misleading. A few years of data showing stability or decline would contradict a blanket claim of a continuous increase across the years.
- Measurement issues, such as shifts in survey wording, response bias, or changes in who is included in the sample, can produce apparent trends that do not reflect real changes in stress levels.
- Since the statement uses the absolute phrase "throughout the years," it implies a consistent, unbroken upward trend. Real-world data are often more nuanced, with periods of increase, plateau, and occasional declines; thus, a universal monotonic rise may be suspicious without specific supporting evidence.
In summary, reasoning about the statement requires careful attention to the particular data source, the time span considered, and the consistency of measurement. The claim can be supported in datasets showing a clear, persistent rise in self-reported stress, but it can be challenged by data with fluctuations, methodological changes, or shorter time horizons.

HLTED-1-21177-S25 Quiz Ch 6

The percentage of people reporting that they are stressed has increased throughout the years.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

How many years of data are needed for trend analysis?

One way to think about the possibilities of the future based is to examine ________ based on historical and current data.

Using contrasts to test for different patterns of results is called

What does a trend analysis show?

Which statement accurately characterizes the trend of campaign spending over time?

The above chart shows demand for leafblowers at a small hardware store. Which of the following describes the trend present in the graph?

Which of the following about Trend is correct?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler