How does the concept of the “cost of circulation” help explain the (theoretical) development of transaction money?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks how the concept of the “cost of circulation” helps explain the theoretical development of transaction money.
The given proposed statement is: 'Because using gold as money requires setting aside real value from social use, societies adopted transaction money—such as paper notes or credit—as a lower-cost substitute that represents value without embodying it.'
This answer centers on the idea that holding or transferring physical commodity money (like gold) imposes a cost on everyday economic activity, since wealth is tied up in money rather than being deployed in production or consumption. The cost of circulation concept suggests that a cheaper, more fluid form of money (such as paper notes or bank credit) can circulate with less real resource use and frictions, thereby facilitating more transactions relative to the value it represents. In other words, transaction money reduces the real-time opportunity costs and logistical costs of moving wealth around the economy, enabling more efficient exchange without the need to continually mobilize tangible gold.
Now, evaluating the claim itself: it correctly identifies the core mechanism—that monetary systems evolve toward forms of money that minimize the social and economic costs of circulation while still representing value. By moving from commodity money to non-physical or credit-money forms, societies can conduct more transactions with lower costs, which aligns with the theoretical intuition behind the cost of circulation.
If we were to contrast with alternative explanations (not provided here), one might argue that other factors such as convenience, trust, standardization, or legal frameworks also shape the adoption of transaction money. However, the central thrust of the statement remains consistent with the cost of circulation argument: reducing the real resource burden of moving and using money supports a transition toward transaction money.
In summary, the statement captures the essence of why cheaper-to-circulate forms of money would develop: they lower the opportunity and transactional costs associated with money in circulation, enabling a broader and more efficient economy, which is the heart of the cost of circulation concept.

ECON 5080-090 Summer 2025 Week 6 Quiz

How does the concept of the “cost of circulation” help explain the (theoretical) development of transaction money?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler