The most cost-effective method of training for organizations is in-house training because it can be tailored to the organization’s specific needs and goals.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a statement about training methods and asks you to evaluate its truthfulness.
Option 1: 'True' — This claim suggests that in-house training is always the most cost-effective method because it can be tailored to the organization’s needs. While customization can reduce waste and improve relevance, saying it is always the most cost-effective ignores several real-world factors. First, initial development costs for in-house programs can be very high, including staff time, curriculum design, and potential downtime. Second, ongoing maintenance, updating content, and delivering training at scale can become expensive. Finally, external options such as off-the-shelf training, vendor-provided programs, or blended approaches may achieve lower per-employee costs, faster deployment, or better access to specialized expertise. Because these considerations vary by organization, the blanket claim of “most cost-effective” is an overgeneralization.
Option 2: 'False' — This choice correctly flags that in-house training is not inherently the most cost-effective method in every situation. The cost-effectiveness depends on factors like scale, frequency, subject matter, expertise availability, and the cost of taking employees away from their work. Outsourcing, e-learning platforms, partnerships, or shared services can sometimes yield lower costs or higher quality for certain needs. Therefore, asserting that in-house training is unequivocally the cheapest option ignores the nuanced cost dynamics and may mislead decision-makers.
Additional nuance: When evaluating cost-effectiveness, organizations should perform a total cost of ownership analysis, considering development or procurement costs, implementation, maintenance, scalability, and measured outcomes. The true assessment often reveals a mix of training approaches tailored to specific goals and budgets.
In summary, the statement overclaims the universal cost advantage of in-house training, while the counterpoint highlights that cost-effectiveness is context-dependent and contingent on multiple variables.

CSR13E1_CPL - Customer Service - CPL Final Exam- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

The most cost-effective method of training for organizations is in-house training because it can be tailored to the organization’s specific needs and goals.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Training programs will least likely include:

What is the most appropriate training method to use when the training budget is very restrictive and fixed?

What type of learning employs on-the-job training, simulations, business games, case studies, and Web-based training?

What is the most frequently used training method?

Which of the following statements is true about training methods?

Which of the following is a type of on-the-job training?

A waste management firm was under scrutiny from environmental organizations. To counter these claims, the CEO assigned five junior managers to study the issue and propose initiatives. Which of the following form of team training was applied here?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler