Which of the following is NOT a type of solution to the 'tragedy of the commons'?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Restating the question: Which of the following is NOT a type of solution to the 'tragedy of the commons'?

Notice: The provided data shows the stated correct answer as 'd. Removing regulatory restraints on economic growth.' but the list of answer options (answer_options) is empty, so we cannot analyze each option individually from the given content. Despite that, we can discuss why removing regulatory restraints would not be a solution.

Why removing regulatory restraints is not a solution:
- It weakens collective governance: The tragedy of the commons arises when individuals overuse a shared resource due to lack of strong, enforceable rules. Removing regulations eliminates the governance structures that help coordinate use, increasing the likelihood of over-extraction or depletion.
- It ignores externalities and long-term costs: Without regulations, individual users may prioritize short-term gains over the resource’s sustainability, imposing costs on others and on future generations.
- It reduces incentives for cooperative management: Regulatory frameworks, property rights, quotas, or permits can align individual incentives with group welfare. Removing restraints tends to erode coordination mechanisms and conflict resolution processes.
- It can accelerate resource collapse: In many classic cases (fisheries, grazing lands, water tables), unregulated use leads to rapid depletion, ecosystem disruption, and loss of utility for all users.

What are common, effective solutions typically proposed for the tragedy of the commons (for contrast):
- Establishing clear property rights or communal management rules to align incentives with sustainable use.
- Implementing regulatory limits, quotas, or licenses to limit total harvest and protect stock.
- Deploying economic instruments like taxes or tradable permits to internalize costs and reward conservation.
- Creating monitoring, enforcement, and accountability mechanisms to deter overuse.
- Incentivizing collective action through community governance, user agreements, and dispute-resolution processes.

In summary, removing regulatory restraints removes the mechanisms that typically prevent overuse and coordinate sustainable management, making it an unlikely or inappropriate solution to the tragedy of the commons compared with regulatory, market-based, or community-based approaches.

IFTE0021_24-25 Mock Exam

Which of the following is NOT a type of solution to the 'tragedy of the commons'?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A market situation where all participants have an incentive to exploit a resource yet no one can limit anyone else's access to that resource, resulting in over-exploitation, can be described as a(n) __________.

Which of the following resources is LEAST likely to suffer from a tragedy of the commons?

A market situation where all participants have an incentive to exploit a resource yet no one can limit anyone else's access to that resource, resulting in over-exploitation, can be described as a(n) __________.

The __________ is the idea that the pursuit of self-interest with no consideration for societal interests leads to disaster.

The overuse of a common resource relative to its economically efficient use is called

Which of the following is NOT a tragedy of the commons?以下哪一项不是公地悲剧？

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler