Cybersquatting occurs when a company, in good faith, registers an Internet domain name that contains the trademark of another, with the intent to take away business from his competitors

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider the statement about cybersquatting and how it is defined in trademark and domain name law.
Option 1: True. The claim asserts that cybersquatting happens when a company, in good faith, registers a domain name containing another's trademark to take business from rivals. This is misleading because cybersquatting requires bad faith intent—typically to profit from the trademark or to mislead consumers—rather than a bona fide business strategy.
Option 2: False. Cybersquatting is generally defined as registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with the intent to take advantage of someone else’s trademark, often to divert traffic, disrupt business, or sell the domain to the trademark owner at a premium. The key element is the lack of good faith and the intent to profit or harm the rightful mark owner, not mere registration for legitimate purposes.
Why the false choice is correct: the statement explicitly says the registration is in good faith, which contradicts the core concept of cybersquatting, namely bad faith or abusive intent. The misalignment with the usual criteria—bad faith, intent to profit, or confusion—renders the statement inaccurate.
Why this matters: recognizing the role of intent is central to anti-cybersquatting laws. Even if a domain name overlaps with a trademark, if the registrant acts in good faith without deceptive or parasitic aims, it may not constitute cybersquatting under these regimes.
In summary, the assertion that cybersquatting occurs in good faith with the described motive conflicts with established definitions that hinge on bad faith and deceptive intent.

Cybersquatting occurs when a company, in good faith, registers an Internet domain name that contains the trademark of another, with the intent to take away business from his competitors

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A trademark can be a word but cannot be a symbol.

Cybersquatting is illegal only if a domain name is identical to the trademark of another, not if the name is merely confusingly similar.

Which of the following are core legal purposes of trademark protection in branding? (Select all that apply.)

What was the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the “booking.com” case reference in the text? 题目解析

Which of the following is not a factor the Court considers when determining is there has been trademark infringement?

The USPTO monitors encroachment of a registered trademark.

An applicant cannot register a trademark on the basis of an intention to use the mark in commerce.

Once a trademark application has been examined and appears to be eligible for registration, it is published for opposition in the:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler