Which claim is more effective?

The man-made island the Pearl in Qatar was open in 2008, and it consists of various residential, luxurious towers, townhouses, villas, shops, restaurants, that only some people can afford.
The man-made Island the Pearl in Qatar is a high-end new urbanism development which contributes to social segregation in Qatar.

Question

Which claim is more effective?

The man-made island the Pearl in Qatar was open in 2008, and it consists of various residential, luxurious towers, townhouses, villas, shops, restaurants, that only some people can afford.
The man-made Island the Pearl in Qatar is a high-end new urbanism development which contributes to social segregation in Qatar.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here we examine the two claims and evaluate their impact and clarity before deciding which is more effective.
Option 1: 'The man-made island the Pearl in Qatar was open in 2008, and it consists of various residential, luxurious towers, townhouses, villas, shops, restaurants, that only some people can afford.' This statement provides factual details about the Pearl, such as its opening year and the types of components it contains. It also makes a claim about affordability, suggesting exclusivity. However, as a persuasive claim aiming to be 'more effective,' its effectiveness hinges on whether the target audience views exclusivity as a desirable attribute or as a barrier. The sentence is somewhat long and includes a mix of structural elements (opening date, amenities) and an evaluative judgment (only some people can afford). If the goal is to persuade a broad audience, the emphasis on exclusivity could alienate potential readers who aspire to affordable housing or who resist elitist framing. Additionally, without connecting these features to broader benefits (e.g., economic opportunities, lifestyle advantages), the claim risks feeling descriptive rather than motivational.
Option 2: 'The man-made Island the Pearl in Qatar is a high-end new urbanism development which contributes to social segregation in Qatar.' This claim is more interpretive and evaluative; it argues about social impact (segregation) rather than merely describing the project. It frames the Pearl as part of a broader urbanism movement and makes a normative assertion about social consequences. Its strength lies in provoking critical thinking about urban planning and equity, which can be compelling for audiences concerned with social justice or policy implications. However, as a persuasive claim, it also invites scrutiny: the phrase 'high-end new urbanism' could be contested depending on definitions and evidence about inclusivity, housing mix, and affordability. The effectiveness of this statement depends on the reader’s values and on whether there is supporting data to demonstrate actual segregation effects. If the question aims to judge which claim is more effective, this option has a more analytical and potentially provocative stance, which can be more engaging in debates or advocacy contexts.
Both options balance factual description and evaluative judgment, but the second option shifts the conversation toward social impact and policy critique, which tends to be more impactful for audiences concerned with equity and urban planning outcomes. The first option, while informative, remains descriptive and optional in terms of guiding the audience toward a specific normative conclusion. In terms of persuasiveness and capacity to spark discussion, the second claim generally holds more potential to be considered 'more effective' because it invites evaluation of broader implications rather than focusing mainly on features and exclusivity.
In summary, the second option foregrounds a consequential claim about social effects, which tends to resonate more with readers who scrutinize urban development and its consequences, whereas the first option centers on description and exclusivity without explicitly addressing wider impact, making it comparatively less compelling for persuasive purposes.

LLED_V 200 V06 2025W1 Which claim is more effective?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following is an effective thesis for an essay on the effect of culture on the Italian Language?

Which type(s) of writing use a claim as the thesis statement?

This is a strong thesis statement: Happiness is a human emotion.

Which of these is not a "rule" that writers must follow when creating a thesis statement?

This thesis statement is an example of an umbrella type thesis statement: I think that happiness depends on the person, but most happy people have four things in common: they are grateful, they have a growth mindset, they feel empathy toward others, and they set goals for themselves.

This is an example of a strong thesis statement: Because most people who want to be happy in the world today and who work hard to have a good life.

There are two main types of thesis statements: umbrella and rain coat.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler