Why doesn't putting the secondary mirror in front of the primary mirror in reflective telescope block the view?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Why doesn't putting the secondary mirror in front of the primary mirror in a reflective telescope block the view?

Option 1: It blocks the view, so astronomers point the telescope at the star in such a way that the secondary won't block the star.
- This answer suggests a method to avoid obstruction by pointing the telescope, which is not the fundamental reason. In practice, pointing does not eliminate the physical blockage created by the secondary; the light path and design still involve the secondary intercepting part of the incoming cone of rays. The core issue isn’t simply orientation to avoid blocking, but the optical arrangement that allows light to reach the focus despite the secondary’s position.

Option 2: Telescopes are focused on very far objects, and the secondary is too close to be focused.
- This statement captures the essential optical principle: in a Newtonian reflector or similar designs, the secondary mirror is placed near the focal region, and both mirrors cooperate to redirect light to the eyepiece or detector without forming an in-focus image at the immediate vicinity of the secondary itself. The “too close to be focused” phrasing aligns with the idea that the secondary does not require its own separate focal plane because it sits in the path of converging light and works with the primary to produce a focus at the eyepiece. This reflects the fundamental arrangement of the optical system and why the secondary’s position does not block the final image.

Option 3: The secondary is made of partially reflecting mirror so the ray hitting it can be mixed with the light coming from the primary.
- While the secondary does partially reflect light, the primary purpose of its design is not to “mix” rays with the primary in the sense of creating a combined signal at the same spot. In many designs, the secondary is a curved mirror that redirects light to the focus or to a detector. The idea of mixing rays is more applicable to beam splitters or certain specialized instruments, not the general reason the secondary doesn’t block the view. Therefore this option misstates the functional role of the secondary mirror in typical reflecting telescopes.

In summary, the second option aligns with the optical reasoning that the secondary’s location near the focal region is intentional and compatible with forming a final focus without requiring the secondary to be separately focused, while the other options either mischaracterize the blocking issue or misstate the purpose of the secondary’s reflective properties.

COS SPR 25 class 2 Jan 28 Ch6: Telescopes

Why doesn't putting the secondary mirror in front of the primary mirror in reflective telescope block the view?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler