Which of the following is the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks for the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team, so we need to compare how different incentive structures affect team collaboration and performance.
Option 1: Introduce group incentives and remove individual incentives. Rationale: Group incentives align everyone's interests with the team’s goals, encouraging cooperation, knowledge sharing, and collective accountability. When rewards depend on the team's overall performance, individuals are more likely to support teammates, reduce shirking, and focus on what benefits the group as a whole rather than pursuing purely personal gains. This approach tends to strengthen cohesion and shared purpose, which are critical for team effectiveness.
Option 2: Introduce stricter norms and regulations within the group. Rationale: While norms can guide behavior, tightening regulations can stifle creativity, autonomy, and intrinsic motivation. If people feel micromanaged or constrained, their willingness to go above and beyond for the team may decrease, especially for tasks requiring initiative and collaboration. Norms alone do not directly create the motivation to elevate collective performance.
Option 3: Reward people for their individual performances. Rationale: Individual rewards tend to promote competition rather than collaboration. When people are incentivized based on personal metrics, they may withhold information, rely on others to do team tasks, or engage in behaviors that improve personal standing at the expense of team outcomes. This can erode trust and reduce overall team effectiveness.
Option 4: Introduce operational procedures instead of people-oriented procedures. Rationale: Focusing solely on procedures without addressing people’s motivation can hamper engagement. While efficient processes are important, neglecting relational and motivational aspects—such as recognition, belonging, and shared goals—may lead to disengagement or turnover, which harms team performance in the long run.
In sum, option 1 best supports a collaborative, high-performance team environment by tying rewards to collective achievement, thereby encouraging mutual support and aligned effort. The other options risk undermining teamwork through competition, micromanagement, or neglect of motivational drivers.

PSYC260.001.SP25 260 Worksheet 07 Ch 10

Which of the following is the best approach to motivate people to work harder for a team?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler