Which of the following statements are true?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question analysis: We are asked to identify which statements are true among the given options. The topic touches on sustainability concepts from two sources: the Malaska working group and the Brundtland Commission.
Option a: 'According to the Malaska working group, sustainable development also means mental growth of humans.' This statement asserts that mental growth is a component of sustainable development per the Malaska group. If the Malaska framework extends sustainability beyond environmental and economic dimensions to include human development and well-being, then this statement could be considered true. Given the phrasing, it aligns with a view that sustainable development encompasses holistic human development, including mental aspects, which is plausible within broader sustainability discourse.
Option b: 'The Malaska working group’s definition highlights the importance of economic growth in solving problems.' This claim focuses on economic growth as the central solution. In typical sustainable development frameworks, the emphasis is not solely on economic growth but on balancing environmental stewardship, social equity, and economic viability. Therefore, this option likely overstates the role of growth and is not aligned with a holistic sustainability definition presented by such groups, making it incorrect.
Option c: 'In the Brundtland Commission’s report, nature and its preservation are considered to have intrinsic value.' The Brundtland Report (Our Common Future) upholds that nature has value beyond its use to humans and emphasizes preservation and the interconnectedness of ecological systems, implying intrinsic value. This aligns with the intrinsic value concept and is therefore true.
Option d: 'According to the Brundtland Commission, each country can contribute to sustainable development according to its own interpretation.' The Brundtland Report advocates for sustainable development as a global objective with context-specific national actions, but it does not promote each country interpreting sustainability entirely on its own terms; it stresses shared responsibility and universal principles with local adaptation. Hence, this statement misrepresents the Commission’s stance and is false.
In summary: Option a is considered true if the Malaska framework includes mental/human development as part of sustainable development. Option b is false due to an exaggerated focus on economic growth as the sole solution. Option c is true because intrinsic value of nature is a recognized idea within the Brundtland context. Option d is false because the Brundtland framework calls for common principles with appropriate global and local action rather than each country acting solely by its own interpretation.

Which of the following statements are true?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What does the following statement best describe: "A responsible society strives to meet its needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs"?

Which of the following statements are true?

True or false? The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals are all independent of each other.

SDG 12 (Responsible consumption and production) is the SGD that conflicts with the other SDGs the most.

True or false? Finland’s key sustainable development challenges include the fight against climate change, excessive consumption of natural resources, and the development of economics and employment.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler