Results from this study show that _____________.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt states: 'Results from this study show that _____________.' with the provided correct answer being 'quality is more important than quantity', but no answer options are actually supplied.

First, acknowledge the missing options: without the full list of possible statements to choose from, we cannot evaluate alternative interpretations or compare each option’s validity. In a typical multiple-choice context, we would assess each alternative for logical consistency with study design, measurement, and conclusions.

Now, focusing on the given statement itself:
- Interpretive framing: The claim 'quality is more important than quantity' suggests the study found that the value or impact of outcomes depends more on their excellence or rigor rather than simply on their amount or size. This aligns with many research syntheses where effect size, validity, or practical significance outweigh sheer counts or sample size.
- Potential supporting reasoning: If the study assessed outcomes such as effect magnitude, reliability, or real-world applicability, it may have concluded that high-quality results produce more meaningful evidence than numerous but lower-quality data points. This could reflect emphasis on validity, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or external validity.
- Common alternative interpretations to guard against: Some readers might assume 'more data is always better' or 'quantity drives significance.' A robust study would test these notions by comparing conclusions drawn from large, low-quality data versus smaller, high-quality data, or by showing diminishing returns beyond a quality threshold.

Limitations to consider in evaluating such a statement:
- How is 'quality' operationalized in the study? Is it measurement precision, study design (e.g., randomized vs observational), or data completeness?
- What is the context—are we talking about data collection, sample size, effect sizes, or practical implications? Different contexts may yield different priorities.
- Could there be trade-offs? For example, increasing quality might reduce quantity, but both could be important depending on the research question and constraints.

In the absence of the other answer options, this analysis centers on understanding why such a conclusion could be supported and what caveats researchers should disclose when arguing that quality supersedes quantity in study results.

If you can share the full list of answer options, I can walk through each option in detail and explain why the correct one fits and why the others don’t.

LTL383H5 S LEC0101 Weekly Reading Quiz 3: Nation (2009) Chapter 3 and Hu & Nassaji (2014)

Results from this study show that _____________.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler