Government could correct the overallocation of resources by subsidizing consumers of the product.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Restating the question and options: The statement is 'Government could correct the overallocation of resources by subsidizing consumers of the product.' Options: True or False.

Option 1: True. The reasoning here would be that subsidizing consumers increases their purchasing power, which would raise demand. If resources are already overallocated to this product, increasing demand would likely lead to even more production and resource use, exacerbating the overallocation rather than correcting it. This makes the statement inconsistent with standard analysis of overallocation.

Option 2: False. The core idea behind overallocation is that too many resources are being devoted to the product, often due to overestimation of benefits or externalities. Subsidizing consumers typically boosts demand, which tends to push output up further. Therefore, subsidies to consumers would not correct an overallocation; they would worsen it by increasing the incentive to produce more of the product. In contrast, policies that reduce demand (or increase costs to producers) or taxes/subsidies targeting the demand side in the opposite direction could help correct overallocation.

Additional nuanced points to consider:
- Subsidies to consumers shift the demand curve outward (to the right), leading to a higher equilibrium quantity and price in a typical market, reinforcing the existing overallocation problem.
- If the issue is overproduction due to overconsumption or negative externalities, policy tools such as taxes on the good, cap-and-trade-like constraints, or subsidies/mandates on alternatives might be considered instead.
- The question hinges on the direction of the policy impact: you want to reduce production or consumption for an overallocated good, not increase it; subsidizing buyers does the opposite.

In summary, subsidizing consumers would raise demand and output, not correct an overallocation of resources, which is why the statement is inconsistent with typical economic reasoning about overallocation.

Government could correct the overallocation of resources by subsidizing consumers of the product.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question16 Subsidies for health are likely to work for products for which there is potential for large learning effects False True ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Two solutions to the economic losses caused by socially optimal pricing are providing public and condoning price discrimination.

Imagine the government introduces a new subsidy for measles vaccinations. The government will pay consumers of the vaccination 50% of the vaccination price. Which effect is most likely in the market for vaccinations?

From the list below, the best definition of the word 'subsidy' is

Imagine the government introduces a new subsidy for measles vaccinations. The government will pay consumers of the vaccination 50% of the vaccination price. Which effect is most likely in the market for vaccinations?

From the list below, the best definition of the word 'subsidy' is

A(n) to producers is a payment from the government that decreases producers' cost and encourages them to produce more output.

Which of the following are the effects of a subsidy to producers? More than one answer may be correct.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler