If you submit a handwritten assignment, the incorrect assignment, or a blank assignment, your assignment will be given a 0. This is why it's important to download and double-check your submitted files.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt presents a statement about submission handling for handwritten assignments and emphasizes the importance of downloading and double-checking submitted files.
Option 1: True. An assertion that may reflect typical policy claims that submitting an incorrect or blank file results in a zero and that students should verify submissions to prevent this outcome. One would interpret this as highlighting the need for diligence in the submission process to avoid accidental blank or wrong files.
Option 2: False. This would mean denying that submitting incorrect or blank assignments leads to a zero, or that verifying submissions matters. If this were true, it would suggest that submission outcomes are not penalized for file issues or that there is no precautionary step required, which contradicts common expectations about submission integrity.
To evaluate each option, consider what the original statement is conveying: it asserts a policy consequence (a zero) for certain submission mistakes and recommends a preventative action (downloading and double-checking). The strength of such a claim depends on whether those exact consequences are standard policy and whether verification steps are indeed advised. If the course or system does implement zeros for incorrect or blank submissions, then the statement aligns with that policy; if not, it would be inaccurate. Likewise, the guidance to download and double-check implies a procedural safeguard intended to avoid mis-submissions, which is a reasonable recommendation in many educational contexts. In scenarios where policy details differ (for example, where instructors allow resubmissions or provide grace periods), the strict zero-for-incorrect-submission rule might not hold universally.
From a reasoning standpoint, the true/false evaluation hinges on the specific policy in effect. If you know the course enforces a zero for incorrect or blank submissions and advises verification, the statement would be supported. If the policy allows make-ups or does not penalize submission content in the same way, the statement would be questionable. The core idea remains: the statement communicates a punitive consequence and a preventive step; evaluating its accuracy requires aligning with the actual rules of the submission system in question.

NUT 010 001 WQ 2025 PART A: Food Diary Project Instruction Quiz

If you submit a handwritten assignment, the incorrect assignment, or a blank assignment, your assignment will be given a 0. This is why it's important to download and double-check your submitted files.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler