An example of an ultra-hazardous activity is the manufacturing of dynamite.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The statement given is that an example of an ultra-hazardous activity is the manufacturing of dynamite.

Since this is a true/false prompt, we evaluate the claim directly.

First, consider what qualifies as an ultra-hazardous activity. In many safety, legal, and tort contexts, ultra-hazardous (or abnormally dangerous) activities are those that inherently involve a high risk of serious harm, cannot be adequately guarded against by reasonable care, and are not commonly performed in the public without special precautions. They typically include handling, manufacturing, or storage of explosives, toxic chemicals, or other materials where the potential for catastrophic harm exists even with careful conduct.

Now apply this to the specific example: manufacturing of dynamite involves creating an explosive material that can release large amounts of energy with potential for catastrophic damage if mismanaged, mishandled, or misused. The characteristics of dynamite production align with the criteria of ultra-hazardous activities: high risk, potential for severe harm, and significant consequences if safety protocols fail. Therefore, it is reasonable to categorize dynamite manufacturing as ultra-hazardous.

Possible counterpoints someone might consider include arguments about regulation or the level of expertise required. However, regulation and expertise do not disqualify an activity from being ultra-hazardous; in fact, they often reinforce the recognition of an activity as ultra-hazardous due to the specialized control measures involved. The fundamental risk profile remains high regardless of safeguards, making the activity fit the category.

In summary, the reasoning supports the statement: manufacturing dynamite is an example of an ultra-hazardous activity, because it involves handling an explosive with a high risk of severe harm and requires stringent controls to mitigate those risks.

LEGAL & REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FIN 2050-04 (90533) FINAL EXAM

An example of an ultra-hazardous activity is the manufacturing of dynamite.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Under what legal doctrine does a firm bear legal responsibility for injuries caused by something it made or sold, whether or not it was negligent?

A rule of strict liability leads to...

In a strict liability case, if it can be proved that a business was as careful as possible about its product or service, it is not held liable for the harm that results from its use.

Consolidated Trucking Company transports radioactive materials. Darla suffers from cancer. To succeed in a strict liability action against Consolidated, Darla must show that her injury was caused by

Strict liability in tort requires proof that the defendant’s conduct was intentional.

Strict liability may hold manufacturers responsible for their products even if they acted with due diligence and reasonable care.

To sue for strict liability, privity is not required.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler