What ESG feature is often overlooked in screening approaches for collective investment funds?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The query asks which ESG feature is often overlooked in screening approaches for collective investment funds.

Option 1: 'Position-weighted ESG portfolio score' — This feature focuses on scoring based on ESG factors tied to positions in the portfolio. While useful, it is a standard analytical tool in many screening frameworks and is not typically singled out as the most overlooked element.

Option 2: 'Portfolio carbon exposure' — Carbon exposure is a common screening criterion in many ESG programs, especially given investor and regulatory focus on climate risk. It is widely tracked and integrated, so it is unlikely to be the feature most commonly overlooked.

Option 3: 'Exclusions, such as those that are socially conscious' — Exclusions (e.g., negative screening) are a traditional and frequently used approach in ESG integration. They are well-established in screening processes, though they can be imperfect, which sometimes leads to debates about their sufficiency. However, they are not typically characterized as the most overlooked feature relative to stewardship.

Option 4: 'Stewardship' — Stewardship refers to active ownership, engagement with companies, voting, and governance-related oversight. In screening approaches, stewardship is often less consistently embedded than metrics like exclusions or carbon exposure, and it tends to be overlooked or treated as a separate activity rather than as part of the screening framework. This makes stewardship a commonly under-integrated element in many fund screening methodologies.

Synthesis: Among the listed ESG features, stewardship stands out as the one that is frequently underemphasized within screening processes for collective investment funds. It involves ongoing active engagement with investee companies and dynamic governance-related actions, which can be harder to quantify and integrate into screening rules compared to more discrete criteria like exclusions or carbon metrics.

Note on alternatives: While position-weighted scores and carbon exposure provide measurable inputs, and exclusions are a traditional screening tool, stewardship’s under-recognition in screening design is a recognized gap in practice. The framing of the question points toward stewardship as the features often overlooked in screening frameworks for collective investments.

FINA3401.13791.202610 FINAL EXAM - Requires LockDown Browser

What ESG feature is often overlooked in screening approaches for collective investment funds?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What ESG feature is often overlooked in screening approaches for collective investment funds?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler