Question at position 35 True or False? "I’ve been knowing Emy for many years." True=the statement is grammatically correct False=the statement is grammatically incorrect TrueFalse

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question at position 35 asks whether the statement "I’ve been knowing Emy for many years." is grammatically correct.
Option 1: True — "the statement is grammatically correct".
In this option, the claim is that the sentence as written is grammatically sound. However, in English, the verb know is typically a stative verb that describes a state rather than an action in progress. Therefore, it is not ordinarily used in the present perfect continuous form (has/have been knowing). The natural, idiomatic way to express a prolonged duration of knowledge about someone is: "I’ve known Emy for many years." Thus, labeling the original sentence as grammatically correct is inaccurate.
Option 2: False — "the statement is grammatically incorrect".
This option asserts that the sentence as written is not grammatically correct. This aligns with standard usage of know as a state verb, which generally does not take the -ing form to indicate a ongoing duration. Since the intended meaning (having knowledge of Emy for many years) is best conveyed with the present perfect simple, the original sentence violates common English grammar rules for stative verbs in continuous aspect. Therefore, describing the sentence as grammatically incorrect is a correct assessment within standard grammar rules.
Extra note: If someone were to insist on a continuous form for a dynamic action with a different verb, such as "I’ve been knowing someone for years" in very rare, nonstandard, or advanced stylistic contexts, it would be seen as unusual rather than correct in ordinary usage. For this particular sentence about knowledge, the simple perfect is preferred.

Question at position 35 True or False? "I’ve been knowing Emy for many years." True=the statement is grammatically correct False=the statement is grammatically incorrect TrueFalse

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

24. I’ve been knowing Elly for many years. This sentence is incorrect because "know" is a non- action/stative verb, so we do not usually use it in the progressive forms. True or False?

33. True or False? Verbs like "believe," "think," "love," and "own" are often used in the simple present because they are non-action or stative verbs.

7. We (loves / are loving / is loving/love / loving) trying new restaurants all the time!

Question at position 36 I have been being very tired lately because of AP testing. This sentence is incorrect. Why?The "be" verb is a stative verb, and we usually don't use stative verbs in the progressive tensebeen is not the past participle of "be""have" should be "had"

Question at position 36 I have been being very tired lately because of AP testing. This sentence is incorrect. Why?"have" should be "had"been is not the past participle of "be"The "be" verb is a stative verb, and we usually don't use stative verbs in the progressive tense

Question at position 36 I have been being very tired lately because of AP testing. This sentence is incorrect. Why?been is not the past participle of "be""have" should be "had"The "be" verb is a stative verb, and we usually don't use stative verbs in the progressive tense

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler