Based on the information provided in Q1, which of the following is true?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks us to evaluate the question: 'Based on the information provided in Q1, which of the following is true?' and references an answer choice that states: 'There is evidence that X is a significant predictor of Y, as the p-value is less than .05.' However, the provided data set for this item is incomplete: there are no answer options listed.

Because the answer options are missing, we cannot determine which statements we are supposed to judge as true or false. In a typical multiple-choice setup, options would specify different interpretations or conclusions derived from the Q1 information, and we would evaluate each in turn. Here, we must proceed with what we have:

- The given candidate statement asserts a finding of statistical significance (p < 0.05) for X predicting Y. Interpreting this requires several considerations:
  - What model was used (e.g., linear regression, logistic regression, Cox model, etc.) and what are the assumptions of that model?
  - What is the exact p-value, and is it adjusted for multiple comparisons if multiple predictors were tested?
  - What is the effect size or parameter estimate for X, and is it practically meaningful in addition to being statistically significant?
  - Was the analysis pre-specified or post-hoc, which can affect interpretation of p-values?
  - Could there be confounding variables, multicollinearity, or data quality issues that influence the reliability of X as a predictor?
  - Was model validation performed (e.g., cross-validation, out-of-sample testing) to assess predictive utility beyond the sample used to obtain the p-value?

- The statement also uses the phrase 'evidence that X is a significant predictor of Y' based solely on a p-value criterion. While a p-value less than 0.05 is traditionally interpreted as 'statistically significant,' this does not automatically imply strong evidence of a meaningful or causal relationship. It reflects the likelihood of observing the data (or more extreme) if there were no true effect, under a specific model and assumptions. It does not quantify effect size, precision (confidence intervals), or causal direction.

- If the surrounding Q1 information includes additional context—such as the confidence interval for the effect size, the sample size, model specification, or whether the p-value has been corrected for multiple testing—those details would be essential to determine the truth of the claim beyond the bare p<0.05 criterion.

In summary, with the absence of answer options, we cannot definitively classify any choice as true or false. The single statement provided could be true in certain analytical contexts but might be misleading or insufficient without information about effect size, study design, multiple testing, and model validity. The lack of options makes it impossible to perform the structured option-by-option evaluation normally expected here.

PSYC20009_2025_SM2 Quiz for Simple Linear Regression: Part 3B 简单线性回归小测：第 3B 部分

Based on the information provided in Q1, which of the following is true?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which variables were significant in your model? (Use an alpha of 10% to draw your conclusions.)

A researcher conducts a study and finds a statistically significant difference between two groups. Which of the following statements is NOT necessarily true?

With large sample sizes, even small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate, a difference often called the effect size, will be identified as statistically significant.

What does it mean for results to be statistically significant?

Reinhart points out that if a researcher runs an experiment and collects a huge sample of data then there is a high chance that they will find a statistically significant value for p when they do the analysis. This implies that:

Martin has found a correlation of r =.18 between the two variables of using prescription stimulants (e.g., Adderall) and frontal lobe activity. This correlation is more likely to be statistically significant if

What determines whether a coefficient estimate is statistically significant?

More Practical Tools for International Students

Exam Browser Assistant

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler