The graph below shows the first difference of the Japanese labor participation rate shown in the previous question. Which of the following is most accurate?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Restating the question and options:
- Question: The graph below shows the first difference of the Japanese labor participation rate shown in the previous question. Which of the following is most accurate?
- Answer options:
  1) The series has a deterministic trend
  2) The series has a stochastic trend
  3) The series has both deterministic and stochastic trends
  4) The graph is not enough to determine the existence of trends

Now, let’s analyze each option step by step:

Option 1: The series has a deterministic trend
- A deterministic trend implies a predictable, non-random, time-ordered pattern such as a steady upward or downward drift that is visible in the data as a constant slope when you plot the series.
- In the first-difference graph, a deterministic trend in the original series would typically translate into a consistent, nonzero drift pattern in the differenced series (for example, a persistent positive or negative average difference over time).
- The provided image of the first-difference series appears as a jagged, fluctuating set of values without a clear linear trend or persistent drift. This makes a strong deterministic trend unlikely. However, absence of a visible deterministic trend in the differenced series does not completely rule out a deterministic component in the original series, so we must be cautious.

Option 2: The series has a stochastic trend
- A stochastic trend in the original series means it follows a unit-root process (random walk with or without drift). When you difference such a series once, you typically obtain a stationary series that fluctuates around a constant mean (often around zero) with no persistent trend.
- The first-difference graph shown seems to hover around a mean with fluctuations that do not exhibit a systematic drift over time. This pattern aligns with what you would expect if the original series had a stochastic trend.

Option 3: The series has both deterministic and stochastic trends
- If the original series had both a deterministic trend and a stochastic trend, the first-difference series would still typically show some deterministic component (a residual drift) unless the deterministic part is exactly removed by differencing. In practice, a remaining drift in the differenced series would be visible as a gradual upward or downward tilt over time.
- The graph does not display an obvious deterministic drift in the first-difference series, making this combination less plausible given the visual evidence.

Option 4: The graph is not enough to determine the existence of trends
- It is true that a single plot of the first-difference series cannot confirm the presence or absence of trends with certainty. Statistical tests (e.g., unit root tests, visual trend assessment, and structural tests) provide stronger evidence.
- Nevertheless, visual inspection can give a reasonable qualitative indication: a lack of clear drift in the differenced series suggests the absence of a stochastic trend in the original, while a visible drift would suggest otherwise. The question asks for the most accurate statement given the graph, so we should weigh the visual cues.

Summary of reasoning across options:
- Option 1 (deterministic trend): The differenced series does not show a clear linear drift, making a robust deterministic trend less likely.
- Option 2 (stochastic trend): The differenced series appears centered around a mean with no trend, which is consistent with the original having a stochastic trend (unit root).
- Option 3 (both trends): Lack of a visible drift in the differenced series makes this combination unlikely from the graph alone.
- Option 4 (not enough information): While formal tests provide stronger evidence, the graph still offers informative visual cues about potential trends.

Putting it together, the most consistent interpretation with a first-difference plot that fluctuates around a constant level is that the original series possessed a stochastic trend. The absence of a clear drift in the differenced series supports this view more than the presence of a deterministic trend or a combination of trends. In summary, the reasoning leans toward Option 2 being the best match to the graph’s appearance, with the caveat that formal testing would provide stronger confirmation.

The graph below shows the first difference of the Japanese labor participation rate shown in the previous question. Which of the following is most accurate?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A time-series which has no significant upward or downward trend is referred to as:[Fill in the blank]

In time series analysis, stationarity means the mean and variance are changing over time

In the context of ARIMA models, what is the main purpose of differencing a time series?

Weak stationarity is less practical than strict (strong) stationarity concept. That's why the latter is used more often than the former

Random walk without drift is a stationary process

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler