A remote farming community in Azerbaijan would not be considered a stakeholder in this project as it would be too costly and time consuming to meet with them.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a true/false statement about stakeholder identification in a project context.
Option 1: True. This asserts that a remote farming community in Azerbaijan would not be a stakeholder because engaging with them is too costly and time-consuming. While practicality matters, stakeholders are defined by their relationship to the project and potential impact, not by the cost of engagement alone. Dismissing them entirely risks neglecting legitimate interests, rights, and potential impacts, which is generally discouraged in stakeholder analysis.
Option 2: False. This says that the community would be considered a stakeholder regardless of the cost or effort required to engage. In standard stakeholder management, all groups that can affect or be affected by the project should be identified and analyzed, even if engagement is challenging or resource-intensive. The rationale emphasizes inclusivity and due process: if a group has a potential interest or impact, they are part of the stakeholder ecosystem and merit consideration, with appropriate engagement strategies balanced against feasibility.
Considerations that influence stakeholder inclusion include potential impact magnitude, legitimacy of interests, and the possibility of influence on project outcomes. While it’s reasonable to plan and budget for engaging hard-to-reach groups, the ethical and governance norms of many projects require recognizing them as stakeholders and seeking feasible ways to involve them. Conversely, simply labeling engagement as “too costly” does not justify excluding a stakeholder group from the analysis, unless there is a clear, documented rationale and alternative engagement methods have been exhausted or deemed impractical under specific constraints.
Thus, the statement in option 1 is misleading because it implies stakeholders can be dismissed due to cost, while option 2 correctly reflects that stakeholders exist based on potential impact and interest, even if engagement is challenging.

4510_PROJMGNT_1001UAC Quiz 3 - Case Study

A remote farming community in Azerbaijan would not be considered a stakeholder in this project as it would be too costly and time consuming to meet with them.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Dove’s “Real Beauty” campaign challenges unrealistic beauty standards and promotes body positivity. Which stakeholder group primarily benefits?

David was asked by his manager to perform a stakeholder analysis. What questions should David entertain in doing so?

Which of the following is not relevant to understanding stakeholders' motivation towards a project?

Which of the following best describes the purpose of a stakeholder analysis?

以下哪些问题属于利益相关者影响分析的五个步骤的一部分？ BlackTom分析

Stakeholder impact analysis is a decision tool that helps a company do which of the following? BlackTom Analysis

Which of the following three important stakeholder attributes should managers pay special close attention to in order to better understand stakeholder impact analysis?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler