Stacks_P_6

Consider an ArrayStack instance that undergoes the following operations:

After all the operations above have been performed in order, answer the following:
Part 1: What is the final state of the stack (from bottom of the stack to top)?Part 2: What value would be returned by the last pop() operation shown above?

Question

Stacks_P_6

Consider an ArrayStack instance that undergoes the following operations:

After all the operations above have been performed in order, answer the following:
Part 1: What is the final state of the stack (from bottom of the stack to top)?Part 2: What value would be returned by the last pop() operation shown above?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the given problem to ensure we understand what is being asked and what the possible outcomes are. The prompt describes an ArrayStack instance that undergoes a sequence of operations (not shown here), and asks two things after all operations: Part 1 the final state of the stack from bottom to top, and Part 2 the value returned by the last pop() operation. The answer options present different final stack contents and corresponding last popped values. Now let’s evaluate each option in turn, considering what a typical ArrayStack behavior would produce after a sequence of push and pop operations, and paying close attention to order and which elements remain or are removed.

Option 1: Part1: The stack is now ['apple', 'banana', 'date'], and
Part2: the last pop() will return 'date'.
This option claims that, from bottom to top, the stack reads apple, then banana, then date. It also asserts that the last pop() yields date, implying date is the top element just before the final pop. If this were true, then date would have remained on top at the end of the sequence, and the final pop would remove date, leaving ['apple', 'banana'] if another pop followed. The reasoning here hinges on whether date was indeed the top element after all pushes and any intervening pops; without the exact operation sequence, this option plausibly represents a consistent top element, but we would need to verify against the given operations to confirm.

Option 2: Part1: The stack is now ['apple', 'banana', 'date'], and
Part2: the last pop() will return 'cherry'.
This choice also ends with the same bottom-to-top order apple, banana, date, which implies date is the final top element before the last pop. However, it claims that the last pop returns cherry, a value that, by the stated top order, should have been beneath date or removed earlier. If date is on top, the last pop should return date, not cherry, unless there was a pop immediately after pushing cherry that removed cherry and then date remained on top. The mismatch between the top being date and the last pop returning cherry indicates an inconsistency with a straightforward stack last-in-first-out behavior given the stated final order.

Option 3: Part1: The stack is now ['apple', 'banana'], and
Part2: the last pop() will return 'cherry'.
Here, the final stack excludes date and has only apple and banana from bottom to top, suggesting that date (and perhaps cherry, depending on the exact sequence) were popped off in earlier steps. If cherry is the last popped value according to this option, that would imply cherry was at the top immediately before the final pop. But since the final stack order ends at banana as the top, the claim that the last pop returns cherry would be inconsistent unless there were additional pushes or pops that altered the top right before the final operation. Overall, this option introduces a top element that is not present in the final stack and assigns a last pop value (cherry) that would have had to be removed earlier in the sequence to yield banana as the top.

Option 4: Part1: The stack is now ['apple', 'cherry', 'date'],and
Part2: the last pop() will return 'banana'.
This option presents a non-monotonic reordering from apple, cherry, date, which would require interleaved operations that mix existing elements in ways not typical for a simple stack (where the order is determined strictly by pushes and pops). If the final stack is ['apple', 'cherry', 'date'], then the top is date, and the last pop should return date, not banana. Returning banana as the last popped value would imply banana was on top at the moment of the final pop, which conflicts with the stated final stack content. The combination shown here seems inconsistent with standard stack semantics given the final contents.

Across all options, a key consistency check is that the last pop’s return value should be the current top element of the stack immediately before that final pop, and the final Part 1 state should reflect the effect of all preceding pops and pushes in the exact order they occurred. Since the actual sequence of operations is not provided in the text here, we evaluate each option for internal consistency: Does the claimed top element align with the last pop value? Does the final stack state make sense given a last pop on the top element? Do the bottom-to-top orders agree with a typical LIFO (last-in, first-out) process?

In summary:
- Option 1 presents a coherent bottom-to-top order and a last pop that matches the top element in that order, which is internally consistent if the top element before the final pop is indeed 'date'.
- Option 2 also presents the same final stack order but assigns a last pop of 'cherry', which would not align with a top element of 'date' under standard LIFO behavior unless there’s an intervening operation that changed the top just before the final pop in a way not reflected by the stated final stack.
- Option 3 changes the final stack to exclude 'date' and 'date' becomes absent, while claiming the last pop is 'cherry', which would require a sequence where 'date' was removed earlier and 'cherry' was the actual top at the end, but this contradicts the final stated stack containing only 'apple' and 'banana'.
- Option 4 indicates a final top as 'date' but claims the last pop is 'banana', which is inconsistent since the last pop should remove the top element, here implied to be 'date'.

Thus, each option can be weighed by checking this core consistency between final stack state and the value of the last pop, guided by the standard LIFO behavior. Note that without the exact sequence of push/pop operations, we rely on internal consistency checks rather than absolute confirmation for any single option.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following Python data structures can be used to implement a stack efficiently?

Which of the following is LIFO (Last In First Out)?

Which of the following best describes what a "stack" is?

What is the result of performing the following stack operations starting with an empty stack: push(1), push(2), pop(), push(3), peek()?

What will this code print?

Stacks_2 See the Stack ADT implemented using a Python's List, this ADT was discussed in lectures. The pop method's amortized run time complexity is O(____).

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler