Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about cuing studies with spatial neglect patients and what those studies have found.
Option 1: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to cued stimuli in the left visual field' This statement would imply impairment when responding to stimuli that are correctly cued and presented on the left, but cuing studies typically reveal deficits specific to miscuing or misdirected attention rather than simply cued responses in neglect, making this option less accurate as a general hallmark.
Option 2: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to miscued stimuli in the left visual field' This aligns with findings from cuing paradigms in spatial neglect where patients show slowed reaction times when the cue misdirects attention or when a stimulus is presented in the contralesional field despite miscuing, reflecting a failure to reorient attention and the cost of invalid cues.
Option 3: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to cued stimuli in the right visual field' This would indicate a deficit for right visual field cued stimuli, which is opposite to the typical pattern in left-neglect patients who have more pronounced deficits for stimuli in the left (contralesional) field, not the right.
Option 4: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to miscued stimuli in the right visual field' While this mentions miscued stimuli, neglect-related slowing is characteristically stronger for the left/contralesional side; right-field miscues are less commonly reported as the primary pattern in spatial neglect, making this option less consistent with established findings.
In summary, the core idea from cuing studies in spatial neglect is that invalid or misdirected cues, especially when the target appears in the contralesional (left) field, lead to disproportionately longer reaction times, reflecting difficulty in reorienting attention. The other options either describe intact performance for cued left-field stimuli, or they emphasize right-field effects or incorrectly attribute the hallmark deficit to cued rather than miscuing conditions.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Week 8: Object-Based Attention & the Cognitive Neuropsychology of Attention

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A study by Posner in which neglect patients performed a spatial cuing task found:

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found: 对忽视症患者进行的提示研究发现：

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

Which of the following statements is correct? “Neglect patients”

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler