Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

Option 1: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to cued stimuli in the left visual field' — This would imply that left-field cued stimuli are disproportionately slow, but spatial neglect typically affects processing of stimuli in the contralesional (often left) field when the patient has right-hemisphere damage, and cuing effects can be impaired in a manner not simply tied to 'cued' left-field stimuli. This option misattributes the deficit specifically to cued left-field stimuli without addressing the classic finding related to miscuing, making it less consistent with the standard cuing-neurology literature on neglect.

Option 2: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to miscued stimuli in the left visual field' — This aligns with reports that spatial neglect patients show delayed responses to stimuli that are miscuing leftward locations, reflecting impaired reorienting or misallocation of attention when cues are inconsistent or misleading toward the neglected side. The term 'miscued' captures the disruption in correct cue utilization, which is a hallmark in cuing paradigms involving neglect.

Option 3: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to cued stimuli in the right visual field' — This would indicate a right-field processing impairment, which is not the typical presentation for patients with right-hemisphere damage causing left neglect. In standard neglect cases, the left visual field is the neglected one; thus unusually long reaction times to right-field cues would not fit the canonical pattern.

Option 4: 'Abnormally long RTs in responding to miscued stimuli in the right visual field' — While miscuing can disrupt processing, neglect literature robustly emphasizes deficits relating to the neglected left side, not the right side, in these patients. This makes the option inconsistent with the common lateralization of neglect after unilateral brain injury.

Putting these considerations together, the study design typically shows that spatial neglect patients struggle more with miscued information that involves the neglected (often left) side, resulting in longer reaction times when processing miscued stimuli in that field. The other choices either mistake the nature of cued versus miscued processing, or misstate which visual field is most affected based on the usual neglect syndrome.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Practice Exam- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

A study by Posner in which neglect patients performed a spatial cuing task found:

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found: 对忽视症患者进行的提示研究发现：

Cuing studies with spatial neglect patients have found:

Which of the following statements is correct? “Neglect patients”

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler