Which of the following best represents the Currency component of the CRAAP test?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the options, we first recall that the Currency component of the CRAAP test assesses how up-to-date or current the information is. This helps determine whether the material is still relevant for its topic and whether newer information might exist.
Option 1: 'The qualifications of the author' speaks to Authority, not Currency. It addresses the expertise and credentials of the person or organization behind the information, which is about who wrote it rather than how current it is. 
Option 2: 'The reason why the information was written' pertains to Purpose or Intent. This looks at why the information exists (e.g., to inform, persuade, sell, or debate) and can reveal potential biases, rather than its timeliness. 
Option 3: 'The timeliness of the information' directly ties to Currency. It asks whether the information is recent enough to be trustworthy for the topic at hand and whether it has been updated as needed. This is the core idea behind Currency.
Option 4: 'Whether the information is supported by evidence' relates to Coverage or Relevance of sources, or sometimes to verifiability, but it focuses on the strength of the support rather than how current the material is.
In summary, the statement that best aligns with Currency emphasizes how up-to-date the information remains and whether it still reflects current research or data, rather than who wrote it, why it was written, or how well it is evidenced.

Which of the following best represents the Currency component of the CRAAP test?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What type of source is this article most likely from?

9. Is the statement true or false? “All .edu websites are academic sources”.

3. Which source is most appropriate for a paper on climate change?

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the CRAAP test?

Which one is not a part of the CRAAP test?

Which of the following is not important when considering whether a source might be useful?

You find an article from 1986 that is highly cited. What could be a problem with this source?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler