Imagine, you are writing about energy technology. Based on bibliographical information, which of the following materials would be the most reliable information source to be referred to in your report.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In evaluating sources for a report on energy technology, we examine criteria such as authority, currency, and reliability of the publication.
Option 1: 'Suhonen, Anssi & Toppinen, Arto 2020. The basics of energy technology for engineering students. Kuopio: Savonia University of Applied Sciences.' This item presents a formal scholarly-style citation with authors, a clear publication year, a university-affiliated publisher, and a specific title aimed at engineering students. Such attributes generally indicate a credible, course-level reference produced in an academic context.
Option 2: 'Brown, H. 1977. The latest trends in energy technology. 2. edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.' While published by a prestigious university press, the title claims to describe 'the latest trends' but the publication year is 1977, making this source severely outdated for current energy technology topics. The phrase 'latest trends' is inconsistent with the age, which undermines its usefulness as a reliable current reference.
Option 3: 'Basics of Energy Technology 2018. Internet publication. www.energytechnologyforall.com. Accessed 29.09.2018.' This is an internet publication with no clear authorship or institutional affiliation listed, and while it has an access date, the lack of authoritative authorship and peer-review cues reduces its reliability compared with a university-press or university-published source. The URL alone does not establish credibility, and online materials without rigorous editorial processes are more prone to bias or inaccuracies.
To determine reliability, we weigh authority and provenance: Option 1 provides a formally published work from an educational institution, aligning with standard expectations for dependable sources. Option 2, though from a reputable press, is antiquated for a 'latest trends' claim and thus not suitable for current information. Option 3 lacks clear authorship and institutional backing, and online sources without strong editorial controls are typically considered weaker evidence in scholarly writing.
In summary, the first option aligns best with the criteria for a reliable information source in an academic report on energy technology, while the others present issues related to currency or credibility that diminish their suitability.

Dashboard QUIZ Academic writing 1

Imagine, you are writing about energy technology. Based on bibliographical information, which of the following materials would be the most reliable information source to be referred to in your report.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What type of source is this article most likely from?

9. Is the statement true or false? “All .edu websites are academic sources”.

3. Which source is most appropriate for a paper on climate change?

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the CRAAP test?

Which one is not a part of the CRAAP test?

Which of the following best represents the Currency component of the CRAAP test?

Which of the following is not important when considering whether a source might be useful?

You find an article from 1986 that is highly cited. What could be a problem with this source?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler