Questions
Questions

ECN 001B B01-B04 FQ 2025 Final Examination

Single choice

Over the last several decades the observed relationship between capital per worker and real-GDP per worker for the United States was linear. What is the most plausible explanation for this observation?

Options
A.There have been no diminishing returns to capital per worker.
B.Ther have been constant returns to capital per worker.
C.There have been diminishing returns to capital per worker but advances in technology had caused shifts in the production function.
D.There have been diminishing returns to capital per worker, but labor migration had caused shifts in the production function.
E.There have been diminishing returns to capital per worker, but series of expansionary fiscal policies had caused shifts in the production function.
View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
Question restatement: Over the last several decades the observed relationship between capital per worker and real-GDP per worker for the United States was linear. What is the most plausible explanation for this observation? Option 1: 'There have been no diminishing returns to capital per worker.' This would imply a constant or increasing marginal product of capital, which is inconsistent with the typical linear long-run relationship observed alongside other factors. In growth models, diminishing returns to capital are standard, so claiming no diminishing returns does not align with standard theory. Option 2: 'There have been constant returns to capital per ......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

Question8 Consider an economy with a Cobb-Douglas production function. Assume that the labour income share parameter is 1/3. The economy is producing 100 units of output and the productivity parameter is equal to 1. If the depreciation rate for capital is 6%, investment rate is 6%, and there are 125 workers in the economy. The growth rate in the economy: is equal to zero because the economy is at its steady state. is positive because the economy is below its steady state. cannot be determined. is negative because the economy is above its steady state. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question5 Ref. Solow-Swan Model. The steady state is defined as the point where capital accumulation, is equal to the depreciation rate. the saving rate. the population growth rate. zero. the productivity growth rate. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question4 The key insight in the Solow-Swan model is that the relationship between capital and output is static. capital accumulation contributes to economic growth. savings have no impact on economic growth. saving rates are determined in a particular manner. capital depreciation enhances economic growth. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question10 In the Solow-Swan model, the steady-state level of output per worker is a function of productivity and the initial capital stock. the initial capital stock, productivity, and the depreciation rate. the initial capital stock, productivity, and the saving rate. productivity, the depreciation rate, and the saving rate. the initial capital stock and the steady-state level of capital stock. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!