Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

A. Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.
B. Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.
C. Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.
D. Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.

Question

Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

A. Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.
B. Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.
C. Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.
D. Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

Option A: 'Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.' This statement highlights a core rationale for prioritizing mobility: it focuses on equal opportunity and the mechanisms that allow improvement regardless of starting point. It aligns with arguments that policies fostering education, skills, and access enable people to rise economically, which many view as a fundamental fairness goal that can coexist with or even complement reducing inequality.

Option B: 'Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.' This is generally inaccurate. A large body of economic research suggests that high inequality can affect demand, social cohesion, investment, and growth potential. By saying inequality has no impact on growth, this option misstates empirical findings and weakens the case for addressing inequality on economic grounds.

Option C: 'Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.' This claim misconstrues policy relationships. While promoting mobility can reduce persistent inequality, it does not automatically replace wealth redistribution mechanisms such as taxes or transfers. Mobility-enhancing policies and redistribution often operate in complementarity, addressing different dimensions of equity and opportunity.

Option D: 'Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.' This is conceptually flawed. Social mobility is about equal opportunity and access to advancement, not about reducing tax revenue or endorsing austerity. Linking mobility to a reduced tax burden through austerity misrepresents how fiscal policy and mobility initiatives interact, and ignores the trade-offs involved in funding public services that enable mobility (like education and healthcare).

In summary, option A correctly frames social mobility as the mechanism by which individuals can improve their economic status regardless of starting conditions, whereas options B, C, and D either misstate empirical evidence, misunderstand policy relationships, or conflate mobility with unrelated fiscal strategies.

ECON&201 15109 Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the 21st Century"

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which is true of social mobility in a caste system?

Compared to White people, Black people are more likely to experience downward mobility. True or False?

In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility. Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility

Gabe came from a working-class family, but through scholarships and part time jobs, he was able to earn an MBA degree and eventually get a job as a corporate executive. This is an example of

______ refers to barriers that keep low-wage workers from ascending from the bottom.

Asian immigrants wanted their children to do well in school because

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler