In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility. Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility

Question

In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility.  Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement under consideration is: 'In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility. Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility.'

Option 1: True. This option asserts that location has very little effect on upward mobility. In reality, extensive social science research indicates that where a child grows up—neighborhood characteristics, school quality, access to networks, safety, exposure to role models, and local economic opportunities—can markedly influence educational attainment, career prospects, and lifetime earnings. Therefore, claiming that location generally has little effect contradicts well-documented findings about neighborhood and school effects, social capital, and spatial inequality. This makes the statement misleading or incorrect based on the research discussed.

Option 2: False. This option states the opposite: that location does indeed matter for upward mobility. Supporting this view, studies show that children from low-income families who grow up in higher-opportunity neighborhoods or attend higher-quality schools often experience better educational outcomes, greater access to networks, and more favorable labor market prospects than those in deprived areas. Mechanisms such as school funding tied to local property values, segregation by income, and differential access to social capital contribute to persistent differences in upward mobility across locations. While individual effort and policies also play a role, the weight of evidence supports the idea that location has a meaningful impact on mobility trajectories, aligning with this statement being correct in the context of the research discussed.

In summary, the first option misrepresents the research by downplaying the role of place and environment, while the second option aligns with the demonstrated influence of geographic and neighborhood context on social and income mobility.

MGT 012Y 001 SQ 2025 Midterm Exam

In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility. Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which is true of social mobility in a caste system?

Compared to White people, Black people are more likely to experience downward mobility. True or False?

Gabe came from a working-class family, but through scholarships and part time jobs, he was able to earn an MBA degree and eventually get a job as a corporate executive. This is an example of

______ refers to barriers that keep low-wage workers from ascending from the bottom.

Asian immigrants wanted their children to do well in school because

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler