Which of the following was not identified by Gillepsie (2014) on our lecture slides as one of the significant social, cultural, or political dimensions of algorithms:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle the question, I’ll review each option in relation to what Gillespie (2014) highlighted as significant social, cultural, or political dimensions of algorithms in the lecture slides.
Option a: Patterns of inclusion. This aligns with discussions about how algorithms can structure who is included or valued within data ecosystems, potentially shaping access, representation, and participation. It is a plausible dimension that could be discussed as part of social and political effects of algorithms. Therefore, this option fits within the expected set of dimensions.
Option b: The promise of ‘algorithmic objectivity’ (discourse). The notion that algorithms embody objectivity and thus mask bias has been a common critical theme in studies of algorithms. Lectures often cover how claims of objectivity can obscure value judgments and social determinants embedded in data and design. This is a standard dimension associated with algorithmic politics and rhetoric, so it would be expected to appear.
Option c: Production of calculated publics. The idea that algorithms help form publics—audiences or communities constructed through data-driven processes and targeted content—fits with analyses of how data infrastructures enable particular collective identities and political subjectivities. This is a typical dimension discussed in algorithmic sociotechnical analyses.
Option d: Creation of exclusion. If the lecture slides, following Gillespie (2014), did not identify this as a significant social, cultural, or political dimension, then this option would be the one that does not correspond to the listed dimensions in that slide set. Since the prompt states that this was not identified, this option describes something not named in the slides.
In summary, options a, b, and c describe dimensions that are commonly identified in discussions of algorithms’ social, cultural, or political effects, while option d—Creation of exclusion—was not identified in the lecture slides as one of the significant dimensions. The reasoning above contrasts each option against the typical themes Gillespie emphasizes in such a framework, clarifying why the non-identified option stands out.

2025 T1 DP DPHU1007 MEDA1307 Media, Society & Politics

Which of the following was not identified by Gillepsie (2014) on our lecture slides as one of the significant social, cultural, or political dimensions of algorithms:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler