Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Exploring the question about approaches to studying social cognition and the speed of thinking, we encounter several candidate descriptions.
Option 1: 'Naïve scientist only' suggests that people always engage in systematic, hypothesis-testing reasoning. In contrast, social cognition research recognizes both quick, automatic processing and slower, more controlled processing, so labeling this as the sole approach is inaccurate.
Option 2: 'Cognitive miser only' posits that people generally rely on mental shortcuts and heuristics to conserve cognitive energy. While this captures the automatic side of thinking, it overlooks the evidence that people can also engage in deliberate, effortful processing when motivation and circumstances call for it.
Option 3: 'Motivated tactician only' emphasizes that individuals tailor their thinking to fit goals and motives, sometimes engaging in extended processing if motivated. However, this view does not account for the pervasive use of fast, automatic inferences that occur without deliberate aim, so calling it the only approach is too narrow.
Option 4: 'Cognitive miser + Motivated tactician' integrates both strands: people often rely on quick, automatic processing (cognitive miserliness) but can selectively shift to more effortful, controlled processing when motivation and goals justify it (motivated tactician). This dual-framework best captures the full spectrum of social-cognitive processing observed in research.
In summary, the question targets the recognition that rapid, automatic thinking is a valid mode under a broader dual-process perspective, and the combined view aligns with how social cognition is typically studied to explain both fast and deliberate reasoning in social judgments.

Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In meta-perceptions that are centered on thinking about other people, ______ exemplifies that we overestimate what is happening in other people’s minds.

When perceiving others, while people often rely on automatic information processing, they are capable of processing information more systematically. Which are essential requirements for this to occur?

An aggressive boy's interpretation of an encounter as hostile and his classmates' perception of his behavior as inappropriate illustrate_____ in behavior development.

Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

When Aristide is getting to know a new person, they ask about their membership to different political groups. Regardless of the person's personality, Aristide bases their opinion on the person's political affiliation. This is an example of:

Which of the following is an example of an actual finding related to social cognition?

How does the Telephone Game support the double empathy problem theory?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler