Repeated unwanted comments/jokes based on one's gender identity, or gender expression, is a form of what? (Select one)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a scenario asking which form of misconduct is represented by repeated unwanted comments/jokes based on someone's gender identity or gender expression. 
Option A: Quid Pro Quo. This term refers to a situation where sexual favors are demanded in exchange for workplace benefits or to avoid negative consequences. It typically involves a power dynamic where submission to harassment is framed as a condition for a positive outcome. Since the scenario emphasizes recurring remarks tied to gender identity rather than a demand for sexual favors tied to employment, this option does not fit well. 
Option B: Hostile Environment. This concept refers to a pattern of behavior, comments, jokes, or actions based on protected characteristics (like gender identity or expression) that creates an intimidating, hostile, or abusive work environment. Repeated comments and jokes targeting gender identity clearly contribute to a hostile environment by normalizing discrimination and discomfort for the targeted individual or group. 
Option C: Sexual Assault. This label denotes physical violence or coercive sexual contact, which is a grave criminal act. The described repeated comments/jokes do not involve physical contact or coercion, so this option does not match the scenario. 
In weighing the definitions, Quid Pro Quo is about exchange for favorable treatment, Sexual Assault involves physical or sexual coercion, and Hostile Environment focuses on pervasive remarks or conduct that create an unwelcoming or harmful atmosphere based on protected characteristics. The repeated gender-based comments and jokes align with creating a hostile environment, as they contribute to ongoing harassment and an unsafe workplace climate. 
From a reasoning standpoint, the key distinction lies in whether the behavior constitutes a pattern of pervasive remarks (hostile environment) versus transactional coercion (quid pro quo) or criminal physical harm (sexual assault). The scenario emphasizes ongoing verbal conduct tied to gender identity, which is characteristic of a hostile environment. 
Overall, evaluating the definitions and the nature of the behavior described, the option that best matches the scenario is the one describing a hostile environment.

Repeated unwanted comments/jokes based on one's gender identity, or gender expression, is a form of what? (Select one)

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 15 Q15 Internship (same-sex sexual harassment)YesNo

Question at position 5 Which of the following is correct? Only gay men will sexually harass a manA single incident may amount to sexual harassmentIf a person did not try to fight their harasser off, then it was not sexual harassment

Question at position 4 Which can be a defense against an allegation of sexual harassment? The complainant wore a skimpy outfit which means she invited sexual attentionI was just joking when I made the sexual remarksNone of the above

Question at position 2 What is the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment?Subjective Test & Objective TestSubject Test & Objection TestSubjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler