Question at position 2 What is the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment?Subjective Test & Objective TestSubject Test & Objection TestSubjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test

Question

Question at position 2 What is the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment?Subjective Test & Objective TestSubject Test & Objection TestSubjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When approaching the question about the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment, I start by listing the given options and identifying the proposed pairings.
Option 1: 'Subjective Test & Objective Test' pairs a personal, internal assessment with an external, observable standard. This combination aligns with how many legal and policy frameworks evaluate harassment by considering both the complainant's perception and the reasonable interpretation by a third party.
Option 2: 'Subject Test & Objection Test' uses 'Subject Test' which is not a recognized term in evaluating harassment, and 'Objection Test' is not a standard evaluative criterion in sexual harassment analyses, making this pairing implausible.
Option 3: 'Subjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test' combines a psychological delay-of-gratification experiment with a subjective standard, which is an odd mix for evaluating harassment and does not reflect typical assessment frameworks used in workplace or academic policies.

To determine why the first option is preferred, consider that the core idea in harassment assessment often involves a subjective element—how the conduct was perceived by the complainant—paired with an objective standard—whether a reasonable person would view the conduct as harassment. This dual approach helps protect individuals while maintaining consistency with social norms and legal expectations.
The second option suffers from terminology issues: 'Subject Test' is not a recognized component in standard harassment analyses, and 'Objection Test' lacks a basis in established evaluative criteria for harassment assessments.
The third option likewise introduces an irrelevant methodological reference ('Stanford Marshmallow Test') that does not pertain to evaluating harassment, thereby weakening its plausibility as a two-step test.

In summary, Option 1 correctly reflects a commonly used two-step framework that integrates both subjective perception and objective reasonableness, whereas Options 2 and 3 rely on nonstandard terms or unrelated concepts that do not typically appear in sexual harassment determinations.

Question at position 2 What is the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment?Subjective Test & Objective TestSubject Test & Objection TestSubjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Repeated unwanted comments/jokes based on one's gender identity, or gender expression, is a form of what? (Select one)

Question at position 15 Q15 Internship (same-sex sexual harassment)YesNo

Question at position 5 Which of the following is correct? Only gay men will sexually harass a manA single incident may amount to sexual harassmentIf a person did not try to fight their harasser off, then it was not sexual harassment

Question at position 4 Which can be a defense against an allegation of sexual harassment? The complainant wore a skimpy outfit which means she invited sexual attentionI was just joking when I made the sexual remarksNone of the above

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler