In Scheme, which expression allows for sequential bindings where each variable can use the previous bindings?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about a Scheme expression that allows for sequential bindings where each variable can use the previous bindings.

In Scheme and many Lisp-family languages, there are several binding forms with different evaluation rules:
- let typically binds all variables in parallel, so later bindings cannot refer to earlier ones within the same let expression unless you restructure the code.
- let* binds variables sequentially; the value of each binding can refer to the bindings that were established earlier in the same let*.
- letrec is designed for mutually recursive bindings, where the bound variables can refer to each other within the set of bindings, often used for procedures that need to refer to each other.
- define (at top level) or set!-style assignments are not structured bindings in the same way and do not provide the same sequential binding semantics within a single expression.

Since the task is to identify the form that enables sequential bindings where each subsequent binding can use the previous ones, let* is the canonical choice because its semantics are explicitly sequential evaluation of bindings.

If you were given a list of options, you would compare each to these semantics: any option claiming that bindings are evaluated all at once (in parallel) would be incorrect for this goal, whereas an option describing sequential bindings where later bindings can reference earlier ones would be correct.

Note: Without the actual options provided in this prompt, the general rule is that let* provides the desired sequential binding behavior, while let does not permit such direct sequential references within the same expression, and letrec handles recursive or mutually recursive references.

Section Merge: Merged CMPSC 461(SP 25) Micro learning Quiz 3

In Scheme, which expression allows for sequential bindings where each variable can use the previous bindings?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler