If I were driven by the self-assessment motive, who would I be most likely to want to interact with?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by restating the question in our own words: If I were driven by the self-assessment motive, who would I be most likely to want to interact with?
Option 1: 'Someone who only has negative things to say about me' This choice emphasizes negative feedback exclusively. While constructive criticism can be valuable, the phrase 'only negative things' ignores the potential usefulness of balanced feedback and may reflect an intolerance for any dissent, which is inconsistent with a motive geared toward accurate self-evaluation.
Option 2: 'Someone who only has positive things to say about me' This option centers on uncritically flattering feedback. Relying solely on praise would hinder accurate self-assessment by creating blind spots, so it does not align with a motive that seeks truth about oneself.
Option 3: 'It depends how I think about myself' This option introduces a self-referential consideration about prior self-concept. While self-perception can influence how one interprets feedback, the self-assessment motive generally focuses on obtaining accurate information from others, regardless of one’s starting beliefs. It is not the clearest articulation of whose input would be sought.
Option 4: 'Someone who has either positive or negative things to say about me, as long as what they're saying is accurate' This choice emphasizes obtaining feedback that is informative and accurate, regardless of its valence. It captures the idea that self-assessment is improved by credible information, whether praise or criticism, which aligns with a motive to understand oneself more accurately.
Now, considering the overarching concept: a self-assessment motive drives a person to gather information that helps refine self-knowledge. Feedback that is accurate, even if not entirely flattering, provides genuine data about behavior, strengths, and areas for growth. In contrast, relying solely on positive feedback (Option 2) or only negative feedback (Option 1) would bias self-knowledge. Option 3 introduces a conditional on self-view, which makes the interaction contingent on one’s own beliefs rather than on the pursuit of accurate information. Therefore, Option 4 best fits the idea of seeking informative input from others, regardless of its positivity, provided it is accurate.
In sum, the most reasonable alignment with the self-assessment motive is to engage with anyone who offers accurate feedback, since accuracy is what supports truthful self-understanding, whereas skewed valence limits insights. The other options fail because they privilege either negativity only, positivity only, or depend on the thinker’s own self-view rather than the reliability of the information.

If I were driven by the self-assessment motive, who would I be most likely to want to interact with?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

I periodically review to help me understand important relationships.

The TED Talk by Jim Beqaj asks 4 questions: 1) what are you good at, 2) who do you work best with, and 3) how do you resolve conflict, and 4).....

If I were driven by the self-assessment motive, who would I be most likely to want to interact with?

I have good skills in independent work.

I feel ready for more demanding research experience.

If I were driven by the self-assessment motive, who would I be most likely to want to interact with?

So far how confident are you in this subject?

I have no problems taking this quiz.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler