In an experiment by McKay (1973), people shadowed ambiguous sentences like They threw stones towards the bank”, while words like “money” or “river” were presented on the unattended channel. In a subsequent recognition test, they were more likely to pick as familiar a sentence whose meaning was related to the word that had been presented on the unattended channel. This finding was interpreted as evidence for:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this question, we are considering an experiment by McKay (1973) where participants shadowed ambiguous sentences such as 'They threw stones towards the bank' while words like 'money' or 'river' appeared on an unattended channel. Later, in a recognition test, participants tended to endorse as familiar a sentence whose meaning related to the word that had been presented on the unattended channel. This pattern points to how semantic information from the unattended input influenced memory and recognition, even though it was not consciously attended to.

Option 1: 'An early-selection theory of attention.' Early-selection theories posit that only information that passes a perceptual filter and reaches awareness is processed semantically. If this were the case, unattended words like 'money' or 'river' should not influence recognition of sentences based on their meaning, because semantic processing would be blocked before deeper analysis. The McKay finding challenges this, since semantic relations from unattended content affected recognition, suggesting processing beyond simple perceptual filtering.

Option 2: 'A capacity theory of attention.' Capacity theories describe attention in terms of a limited pool of processing resources that can be allocated. While compatible with some interpretations of how unattended information might be processed under high load, the specific McKay result emphasizes semantic processing of unattended input rather than a general resource limitation, making this choice less direct as an explanation for the observed semantic integration.

Option 3: 'A filter theory of attention.' Filter theories typically specify a selection mechanism that filters information based on physical features or simple cues before deeper processing. The McKay result indicates that unattended semantic content influenced later recognition, which a strict filter would not predict if the unattended content were blocked from semantic processing. Thus this option mischaracterizes the mechanism implied by the findings.

Option 4: 'A late-selection theory of attention.' Late-selection theories propose that all incoming information is processed semantically to some extent and that selection into awareness occurs at a later stage, based on meaning or relevance. The McKay study, showing that the meaning of unattended words biased recognition of related sentences, aligns with this view by demonstrating semantic processing of unattended input prior to conscious selection, thereby supporting a late-selection account.

Overall, the key takeaway is that the unattended channel was not simply ignored at an early perceptual stage; instead, its meaning was processed and could influence subsequent recognition, which is best captured by a late-selection interpretation.

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Supplementary or Special Exam: Cognitive Psychology (PSYC20007_2025_SM2)- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Eriksen and St James (1986) argued that performance on the Eriksen flanker task is best explained by:

Gray and Wedderburn’s (1960) “Dear Aunt Jane” experiment was a problem for filter theory because:

In Broadbent’s “split span” experiments, he found that people prefer to recall two dichotically presented sets of digits on an “ear by ear” basis. Broadbent interpreted this preference as indicating:

In the late-selection model of selective attention:

Cherry (1953) compared selective attention for dichotic and binaural stimulus presentation. He found:

According to Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961), what happens when only one dimension is relevant in categorisation?

Complete this sentence: In a categorisation task, selective attention to relevant dimensions...

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler