Your class is discussing scientific results that were published in recent issues of scientific journals. You can be confident that:

Question

Your class is discussing scientific results that were published in recent issues of scientific journals.  You can be confident that:

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: Your class is discussing scientific results that were published in recent issues of scientific journals. You can be confident that:

Option 1: The results are absolutely True; scientists never make mistakes. This is an overconfident and incorrect characterization. Scientists are human and use methods that are open to error, bias, or misinterpretation; errors can occur in data collection, analysis, or reporting, so absolute certainty without replication or scrutiny is not warranted.

Option 2: The results are probably true, or close to true, but there is at least a little chance that they are just lucky. This choice reflects a cautious scientific mindset: findings are credible if they are robust, replicated, and supported by careful methodology, but researchers acknowledge that chance, sampling variation, or methodological quirks can produce false positives. It emphasizes the need for replication and critical evaluation of evidence.

Option 3: The results are contaminated by Penn State approved soft drinks, because all scientists drink those soft drinks, and all scientists are sloppy and spill a lot. This statement relies on a stereotype and an unfounded conspiracy-like claim. It wrongly attributes scientific outcomes to a non-scientific and irrelevant factor, and it generalizes unhelpfully about scientists rather than focusing on data quality and methodological integrity.

Option 4: The results are false; scientists always cheat. This is an extreme and unfounded generalization that contradicts the core practices of science, which include peer review, replication, transparency, and ethics. While misconduct can occur in rare cases, it is not accurate to say scientists always cheat, nor does that reflect the normal standards of scientific investigation.

Additional notes: Among the provided options, the second choice aligns with standard scientific reasoning about evaluating published results, emphasizing caution, replication, and recognition of uncertainty. The other options rely on absolutist or stereotype-driven claims that misrepresent how scientific evidence should be interpreted or how scientific communities operate.

GEOSC 10 (SP 25 Merged) Geology of National Parks RockOn #1

Your class is discussing scientific results that were published in recent issues of scientific journals. You can be confident that:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following qualities would you say best represent scientific thinking?

Which of the following statement is incorrect.

Which of the following ranking is correct in science:

A Scientific Law must be:

A Scientific Law must be:

Question1 What is the most important feature of a hypothesis? That it is quantifiable. That it is falsifiable. That it is verifiable. That it is theoretical. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

The objective of the scientific method is to prove a particular hypothesis correct.

Empirical evidence is based on _____.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler