Generally speaking, while you will normally see no more than
[选择]
three
four
five
two
consecutive instances of the same Roman numeral, in some contexts (e.g. on clocks) there may be up to
[选择]
five
three
four
six
.

Question

Generally speaking, while you will normally see no more than 
[选择]
three
four
five
two
 consecutive instances of the same Roman numeral, in some contexts (e.g. on clocks) there may be up to 
[选择]
five
three
four
six
 .

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents two fill-in-the-blank prompts about how many consecutive identical Roman numerals are typically seen, with a note that in some contexts (like clocks) it can be different. For the first blank, we consider how many times a single numeral (like I, X, C, etc.) can repeat in a row in standard usage. In most ordinary uses and in common Roman numeral conventions, you will not see more than three identical symbols in a row, as in III for three. Therefore, selecting three for the first blank aligns with conventional practice.

For the second blank, the prompt indicates a special context (such as on clocks) where a different limit may apply. In clock faces, a common variation is to use four identical numerals in a row in some decorative or conventional representations, even though the general rule is stricter. Hence, choosing four for the second blank corresponds to that clock-context exception.

Now, evaluating the other potential options: for the first blank, options like two, four, five, or six would incorrectly widen or shrink the standard bound—two would be unusually permissive for typical sequences, while four or more would exceed the common maximum in ordinary contexts. For the second blank, options such as three, five, or six would not reflect the common clock-context practice where four is a known exception, and five or more would be atypical even on clocks. Additionally, the option four for the second blank specifically captures the commonly cited clock-context exception, whereas three or six would misalign with that example.

In summary, the first blank being three reflects the standard limit on consecutive identical Roman numerals, and the second blank being four reflects the clock-context exception often cited in discussions of Roman numeral usage on timepieces.

CLA 030 001 WQ 2025 Homework 45: Questions on Linnaeus and Roman Numerals

Generally speaking, while you will normally see no more than [选择] three four five two consecutive instances of the same Roman numeral, in some contexts (e.g. on clocks) there may be up to [选择] five three four six .

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler