Please use Stata to replicate Ch9 Example 9.2 on pp.297-298.

Below is model (9.4):

Based on your estimation for model (9.4), answer the following questions:

(1) What is the null hypothesis of RESET test?

(2) What is the p-value for the RESET statistic?

(3) Do you reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level?

(4) Is there evidence of functional form misspecification in (9.4)?

Question

Please use Stata to replicate Ch9 Example 9.2 on pp.297-298.

Below is model (9.4):

Based on your estimation for model (9.4), answer the following questions:

(1) What is the null hypothesis of RESET test?

(2) What is the p-value for the RESET statistic?

(3) Do you reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level?

(4) Is there evidence of functional form misspecification in (9.4)?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here is a careful walkthrough of the provided option and each component it contains, given the context of a RESET test.

Option content analysis (overall): The option presents a single composite statement with four parts: (1) the null hypothesis of the RESET test for model (9.4); (2) the p-value of the RESET statistic; (3) the decision to reject at the 5% level; (4) the conclusion about evidence of functional form misspecification in (9.4). We will assess each part in turn and then connect them to the total interpretation.

Part (1): Null hypothesis of the RESET test. The standard interpretation of the RESET (Ramsey) test is that the null hypothesis is that the specified regression model is correctly specified in terms of functional form; equivalently, there is no omitted nonlinear combination of the regressors or neglected nonlinearities that would improve the fit. In other words, H0: the model (9.4) has the correct functional form and no misspecification detectable by the RESET procedure. The statement in the option—'The null hypothesis is that model (9.4) on p.297 is correctly specified'—is aligned with this standard understanding. It correctly characterizes the essence of H0 for RESET as a test of correct functional form rather than a test for omitted variables in general.

Part (2): p-value for the RESET statistic. The option states the p-value is 0.0120. Interpreting a p-value of 0.0120 means that, under the null, the probability of obtaining a RESET statistic at least as extreme as observed is 1.2%. This is a small probability, indicating that the data provide evidence against H0 if we consider a conventional significance level such as 5%. The numerical value itself is plausible in typical applied settings and is consistent with a statistically significant result.

Part (3): Decision at the 5% significance level. The option asserts: 'Reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.' Since 0.0120 < 0.05, the correct decision rule would be to reject H0 at the 5% level. This part of the statement follows directly from the p-value provided in Part (2) and standard hypothesis testing practice at the 5% threshold. The chain from p-value to decision is coherent: p < 0.05 leads to rejection.

Part (4): Evidence of functional form misspecification in (9.4). The interpretation that rejecting H0 provides evidence of functional form misspecification is consistent with the purpose of a RESET test: if we reject H0, it suggests that the chosen functional form may be inadequate, and there could be nonlinearities or omitted nonlinear combinations not captured by the current model. Therefore, concluding that there is evidence of functional form misspecification in (9.4) follows logically from a rejected H0 in a RESET framework.

Synthesis across parts: The four components collectively describe a coherent narrative. The null is that the model is correctly specified in its functional form, the p-value indicates significant deviation from that null, the 5% test level leads to rejection, and the rejection is interpreted as evidence of misspecification in the functional form of model (9.4). The reasoning treats each piece consistently: null definition, p-value interpretation, decision rule, and substantive conclusion about misspecification.

Potential nuances to keep in mind: In practice, a significant RESET result indicates potential misspecification but does not pinpoint the exact source or guarantee that misspecification is present in every sense; further diagnostic checks or model refinement may be warranted. Also, the exact context (pp. 297–298 in the referenced text) may include specifics about how model (9.4) is specified and how the RESET terms were constructed, which can affect interpretation nuances. Nevertheless, given the provided statements, the logical chain from H0 to p-value to decision to conclusion is internally consistent for a RESET test framework.

AS.440.606.50.SP25 M10: Assignment

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler