Question at position 12 Which content approach could damage long-term professional reputation despite providing short-term engagement?Collaborating with colleagues and peersFollowing viral trends and taking controversial stancesSharing industry insights and expertiseDemonstrating professional growth and learning

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which content approach could harm long-term professional reputation even if it yields short-term engagement.
Option 1: 'Collaborating with colleagues and peers' This is generally a positive practice that can build credibility, trust, and a strong professional network, contributing to a solid reputation rather than damaging it.
Option 2: 'Following viral trends and taking controversial stances' This option describes chasing trends and making provocative or polarizing statements, which can generate quick attention but risks alienating peers, clients, or employers and may undermine long-term reputation once the novelty wears off.
Option 3: 'Sharing industry insights and expertise' Providing valuable, well-founded knowledge typically enhances reputation by demonstrating competence and authority within a field, aiding long-term trust.
Option 4: 'Demonstrating professional growth and learning' Showcasing ongoing development signals commitment and adaptability, which usually strengthens reputation over time.
Thus, evaluating the potential impact: the option that stands out as potentially damaging for long-term standing is option 2, since provocative or trend-driven content can lead to lasting backlash or misalignment with professional standards, even if it boosts short-term engagement.
In summary, option 2 is the one that could compromise long-term reputation despite offering brief engagement gains. The other options are aligned with constructive professional branding and relationship-building.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What is one reason corporate leaders may resign from advisory boards?

Question at position 8 According to the reputation damage response framework, what is the correct sequence of actions when dealing with problematic content?Acknowledge, Delete, ClarifyDelete, Acknowledge, ClarifyClarify, Delete, AcknowledgeDelete, Clarify, Acknowledge

Question at position 14 According to the reputation damage response framework, what is the correct sequence of actions when dealing with problematic content?Delete, Acknowledge, ClarifyClarify, Delete, AcknowledgeAcknowledge, Delete, ClarifyDelete, Clarify, Acknowledge

What is essential when people mine their data history on the social network following Stella’s method?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler