Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Reframing the question in my own words helps focus on the core concept: Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?
Option 1: 'It enhances bias in the results' — This is misleading. Repeatability and replication are practices used to reduce the impact of bias, not to enhance it. If results were biased, repeating the experiment would just reproduce that same bias, not improve trust in the findings.
Option 2: 'It makes the study more complicated' — While repeating experiments can add workload, complexity is not the fundamental reason repeatability matters. The scientific value lies in the ability to confirm results, not in adding complexity for its own sake.
Option 3: 'It validates and confirms the conclusions' — This aligns with the core purpose of repeatability. When an experiment is repeated and produces consistent results, the conclusions gain credibility and reliability, strengthening confidence in the findings.
Option 4: 'It introduces variability in the findings' — Reproducibility aims to minimize unexplained variability across trials. Introducing more variability would undermine confidence in the conclusions rather than support them.
Additional context: Beyond simply matching results, repeatability enables independent researchers to verify methods, identify sources of error, and establish the robustness of findings across conditions or samples. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate that conclusions are not flukes of a single experiment, but reflect a consistent pattern under the same procedures.
In summary, the option that describes the core value of repeatability is the one stating that it validates and confirms the conclusions, while the other options mischaracterize the role of repeatability or its effect on bias, complexity, or variability.

Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

Scientific research requires that experiments be reproducible, which means that:

What does it mean when a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher?

A student is collecting data in the research lab. He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect. He then publishes his findings in a research journal. How might this issue have been prevented?

If experimental findings are not reproducible,

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler