What does it mean when a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher, the first important thing to consider is what replication failure implies about the original finding.
Option 1: 'The replication was done incorrectly.' While it’s possible that replication attempts have methodological issues, this answer asserts a specific error in the replication process without evidence. We cannot assume the replication study was flawed without examining procedures, controls, sample sizes, and analysis. This makes the claim speculative.
Option 2: 'The independent researcher’s study is superior.' This is an overstatement. A replication attempt does not automatically prove superiority of one study over another; differences in design, context, and measurement can influence results, and replication success is about consistency, not hierarchy.
Option 3: 'The topic should no longer be researched.' This is an extreme reaction and not warranted by a single failed replication. Scientific inquiry typically investigates why results did not replicate, whether moderating conditions exist, or whether the effect is context-dependent, rather than ending investigation.
Option 4: 'The importance of the finding should be interpreted cautiously.' This option acknowledges that replication failure invites caution in interpreting the original finding. Replication problems can indicate the effect is weaker, more conditional, or potentially a false positive, so researchers should temper claims and seek additional evidence.
Overall, the prudent interpretation given replication challenges is to exercise caution regarding the original claim, rather than assuming replication error, superiority, or abandoning the topic. The nuanced takeaway emphasizes reevaluating effect size, context, and robustness before drawing firm conclusions.

PSY309H5 F PRA0101 PSY309 Term Test 2

What does it mean when a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

Scientific research requires that experiments be reproducible, which means that:

Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?

A student is collecting data in the research lab. He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect. He then publishes his findings in a research journal. How might this issue have been prevented?

If experimental findings are not reproducible,

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler