A student is collecting data in the research lab. He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect. He then publishes his findings in a research journal.

How might this issue have been prevented?

Question

A student is collecting data in the research lab.  He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect.   He then publishes his findings in a research journal.

How might this issue have been prevented?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The scenario involves a mis-programmed instrument leading to data that may be incorrect, followed by publication of the findings. Since the provided answer options are missing, we cannot evaluate them one by one. Instead, we can reason through why prevention in this situation is generally addressed in research practices.

First, a core principle is replication and validation. Repeating the experiment, or having independent researchers replicate the study, helps identify erroneous data arising from instrument misprogramming or other systematic issues before publishing.

Second, instrument validation and calibration are essential safeguards. Regular calibration checks, verification against known standards, and running control measurements can reveal misconfigurations or calibration drift prior to data collection and analysis.

Third, preregistration and detailed methodological documentation reduce the risk of undetected errors. When researchers preregister procedures, analysis plans, and calibration steps, it becomes easier to spot deviations or errors in implementation.

Fourth, data quality assurance practices, such as blind or double-blind verification where feasible, automated integrity checks, and version-controlled data processing pipelines, help catch abnormal patterns that indicate faulty data.

Fifth, peer review and open sharing of raw data and analysis scripts provide additional opportunities for others to detect issues that the original researcher may overlook due to bias or familiarity with the setup.

If we connect these principles to the specific answer suggestion—"The student should have repeated his research experiment or had others repeat his experiment to verify the original results"—the idea aligns with replication as a preventive measure. Replication can uncover inconsistent or erroneous results caused by instrument mis-programming, preventing flawed conclusions from propagating into the literature.

Other preventive measures might include performing a pilot study to test data collection procedures, cross-checking results with alternative measurement methods, and documenting any anomalies observed during data collection for further scrutiny.

In summary, to prevent publishing potentially incorrect data due to instrument mis-programming, emphasize replication/verification, rigorous instrument validation, thorough documentation, data quality controls, and transparent data sharing. While the provided option emphasizes replication, the broader answer would integrate multiple safeguards to reduce the likelihood of incorrect findings entering the literature.

CHM111L A Lab Report 0: Scientific Integrity

A student is collecting data in the research lab. He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect. He then publishes his findings in a research journal. How might this issue have been prevented?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

Scientific research requires that experiments be reproducible, which means that:

Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?

What does it mean when a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher?

If experimental findings are not reproducible,

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler