Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

Question

Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let's restate what the question is asking: what does it mean for a result to be replicable in scientific terms?
Option 1: 'The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.' While replicability relates to consistency across studies, this statement describes statistical significance or low probability of random occurrence, not replication across researchers, so it doesn't capture the core idea of replication.
Option 2: 'The results conform to the predictions of a theory.' This describes whether findings align with theoretical expectations, touching on theory testing, but replication specifically concerns obtaining the same results in independent attempts, not just alignment with theory.
Option 3: 'Other researchers can get the same results.' This is the essence of replication: independent researchers reproducing the same findings, which supports reliability and robustness of results.
Option 4: 'Most scientists consider the results important.' The perceived importance or impact of results is about significance or importance, not about whether the findings can be independently replicated.

To ensure understanding, consider that a single study showing a result may be compelling, but replication across different researchers and settings is what confirms that the result is reliable and not a fluke. Conversely, if results cannot be reproduced by others, confidence in the finding diminishes regardless of initial significance or theoretical fit.

In summary, the option that correctly captures the meaning of replicability is the one describing independent researchers obtaining the same results, since replication is the cornerstone of validating scientific findings across different contexts and investigators.

Question at position 5 What does it mean to say that a result is "replicable"?The results would be unlikely to arise by chance.The results conform to the predictions of a theory.Other researchers can get the same results.Most scientists consider the results important.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Scientific research requires that experiments be reproducible, which means that:

Why is repeatability important in scientific experiments?

What does it mean when a study cannot be replicated by an independent researcher?

A student is collecting data in the research lab. He accidentally mis-programs his instrument and this leads him to collect data that he does not know is incorrect. He then publishes his findings in a research journal. How might this issue have been prevented?

If experimental findings are not reproducible,

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler