Question at position 15 Why are Meredith and Sami rowing to Hawaii from California?to raise awareness about the dangers of sugarto show that exercise is much more important than dietto raise money for McDonalds Ronald McDonald House Charityto show that the negative effects of sugar can be cured by exercise

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, restating the question and all answer choices to frame what we are evaluating:
Question: Why are Meredith and Sami rowing to Hawaii from California?
Answer options:
- to raise awareness about the dangers of sugar
- to show that exercise is much more important than diet
- to raise money for McDonalds Ronald McDonald House Charity
- to show that the negative effects of sugar can be cured by exercise

Now, evaluating each option in turn:
Option 1: "to raise awareness about the dangers of sugar". This aligns with the common interpretive aim of awareness campaigns that connect actions (rowing to Hawaii) with highlighting health risks (sugar dangers). It presents a plausible, public-facing goal without asserting effectiveness, funding, or medical cures, making it a reasonable intended purpose for such a stunt or campaign.

Option 2: "to show that exercise is much more important than diet". This is a strong claim that oversimplifies the relationship between exercise and diet. Even if the stunt emphasizes physical effort, reputable health messages usually acknowledge that both exercise and diet matter. The phrasing here also implies a value judgment about diet relative to exercise, which is not necessarily the stated purpose of advocating sugar dangers; it’s more about a single facet of health messaging.

Option 3: "to raise money for McDonalds Ronald McDonald House Charity". While charitable stunts sometimes aim to raise funds, there is no indication in the prompt that this specific campaign targets that charity. Moreover, tying a health-focused message (sugar dangers) to a corporate charity would require explicit sponsorship information, which is not provided here. This makes the option speculative and less likely given the context.

Option 4: "to show that the negative effects of sugar can be cured by exercise". This statement asserts a medical cure claim, which is scientifically dubious and generally unsupported by evidence. Campaigns typically avoid claiming cures; they instead warn about risks or promote healthier behaviors. Therefore, this option is inconsistent with standard public health messaging and the tone of a awareness campaign.

In summary, option 1 stands out as the most consistent interpretation of a campaign goal that uses a dramatic journey to draw attention to sugar-related health concerns, without making unsupported medical or promotional claims. The other options introduce problematic oversimplifications, unsubstantiated cures, or missing contextual details about fundraising and sponsorship that are not indicated in the question stem.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Why did Montreal establish a relationship with graffiti artists?

Question at position 4 Questions 4-8 Complete the sentences with NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from Paragraphs 3-6. ...4 ... Tasmania's Question Blank 1 of 1[input] are in danger because of the similarities between its tall eucalypt forests and tropical rainforests.

Questions 11 – 12. Choose a, b or c as the best answer. 11. What is the major problem with transporting food long distances?

How did Neil feel when he first started university?

What is the most appropriate title for paragraph 4?

According to Stella, why may setting their social media profiles to private be a difficult thing for students?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler