Which of the following statements would Mounk and Guzmán most likely disagree with?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which statement Mounk and Guzmán would most likely disagree with, so we must evaluate each option against their perspectives on dialogue, emotion, and bridging divides.
Option 1: “How we talk affects how we think, which then affects how we act.” This aligns with common social-psychology notions that communication shapes cognition and behavior, and it would be consistent with observers who emphasize the impact of discourse on outcomes. It is a plausible statement within their framework.
Option 2: “We often engage in dialogue not despite emotions but with them.” This echoes the idea that emotions are not just obstacles but can be catalysts or integral to meaningful dialogue, a perspective often highlighted in discussions about democratic deliberation and conflict resolution. This would likely fit their view as well.
Option 3: “We should choose which bridges to try to maintain or build.” This reflects a pragmatic approach to dialogue, recognizing that not all bridges are equally worth sustaining and that selective engagement can be strategic in a polarized environment. This stance would plausibly be endorsed by scholars who study democratic engagement and coalition-building.
Option 4: “Dialogue is only possible when both sides agree in advance to neutrality.” This statement frames dialogue as contingent on precommitment to neutrality, which runs counter to many modern theories of dialogue that acknowledge bias, power asymmetry, and the role of nonneutral positioning in deliberation. Given Mounk and Guzmán’s emphasis on engagement amid contested values and the reality that participants bring passions and partialities to discussions, they would likely oppose the claim that neutrality is a prerequisite for dialogue.
In summary, options 1–3 present descriptively plausible views about how dialogue functions in practice, while option 4 posits a strict condition (pre-agreed neutrality) that would clash with their likely stance on the role of emotion, bias, and active engagement in dialogue. Therefore, option 4 is the statement they would most likely disagree with.

Community Citizenship Initiative 2025 (Graduate Students - Morningside) Quiz: How to Have Difficult Conversations

Which of the following statements would Mounk and Guzmán most likely disagree with?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What was surprising about the cost of constructing 5-Star homes?

What is stated in the first paragraph?

Which of the following statements best summarises the writer’s perspective on sustainable building practices?

According to the writer, what role does education play in solving the housing crisis?

What is the main point that paragraph 1 is making?

Which of the following best represents the authors’ recommendation?

In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

According to the text:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler